who is better wilt, shaq or ben wallace?

Answer 1

none of the above

Answer 2

Wilt may have been a little more dominant than Shaq in his prime. However, if you believe that the level of play has improved since the 1960s (in my opinion, it has), then you have to go with Shaq.

Answer 3

ben wallace wilt shaq

Answer 4

Wilt!!!! And then Shaq, and then Big Ben.

Answer 5

Got to go with Wilt. As some one wrote here, stats don't lie.

Answer 6

i will't say both ought to "dominate" the different, because they are both dominant forces. i ought to offer the mild area to Chamberlain. Wilt had slightly more advantageous acceptable footwork, a softer contact, and bigger acceptable mobility. I undergo in ideas at the same time as Karl Malone changed into in his best, and at the same time as Shaq did no longer ought to guard him one on one a great deal, at the same time as he did, he in many circumstances got here out on the quick end of the stick. Malone ought to maneuver round O'Neal, and both score the purpose, or get the massive guy in foul problem. I make this evaluation because Chamberlain and Malone were both bodily solid gamers, who ought to both discover strategies to score the ball around the basket, and on the fast ruin. at the same time as O'Neal receives solid position below the basket he will merely overpower his opponent. yet i will't see that being sufficient of an benefit in a experience-up hostile to Wilt. i imagine Chamberlain ought to extremely strive against Shaq for that solid low submit position spot.

Answer 7

wallace for 3s i guess, shaq for dunks and wilt for everythnig lol

Answer 8

Larry Byrd

Answer 9

Wilt , by far. Stat's dont lie.

Answer 10

wilt chamberlin