2006-09-22 07:30:50 · 12 answers · asked by menschliches.wesen88 6 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Who else would you rather have do it?
The French?????
2006-09-22 07:33:49 · answer #1 · answered by dirftwood22 6 · 6⤊ 0⤋
No we should not police the world we fought a fight a long time ago to have our own beliefs and religion why now does it seem we are trying to make the rest of the world just like us but if you really think about it we are not policing the world for anything but control over someone or something that they have that we want like their oil
2006-09-22 07:36:10 · answer #2 · answered by prissymiss1968 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
They are not a world police.
The reason they seem to be is because they go after these countries saying "we want to help them establish a democracy" but what they are really doing is looking out for their own interests, if they were truly a world police, why did they not help the the spiritual group Falun Gong in China when they are being punished for their beliefs, or what happened in Rwandan or what is happening in Darfur?
if this country sees nothing of interest in these countries, then they will most likely not go out of their way to fix it.
2006-09-22 07:33:31 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Its not right. Its not good. No one should do it.
We as a country should stop being led by fear and remember that even if a few people do hate us.We still share one small planet and are human beings. We as a country should stop calling others terrorists because they do not fall in line to our wishes.We should stop being bullies and we should work on a way for everyone to live together peacefully.Dont believe the governments lies.
2006-09-22 07:35:04 · answer #4 · answered by stephaniemariewalksonwater 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Let them police themselves and destroy their countries and literally beg for our help before we go. We must make a contract with them to get their request in writing. This is one reason we are hated so much. We will still be hated and blamed for all the problems, but at least we could go back and say, "here is the contract" see for yourself.
-m
2006-09-22 07:41:00 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Well, we cannot depend on the UN to do anything. If one country bombed another, it would take years for them to decide what they should do about it.
2006-09-22 07:35:02 · answer #6 · answered by Too Curious 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Our courts are already jammed, but I can always use the extra business.
Anyone know the area code for Gitmo?
Denny Crane
2006-09-22 07:36:00 · answer #7 · answered by Denny Crane 1 · 1⤊ 1⤋
well, the U.N. is really supposed to do something to prevent another Hilter-like situation from happening but they seem pretty useless. They are sure good at cheering for stupid dictators though......
2006-09-22 07:35:22 · answer #8 · answered by heypbk2 2 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Nope. I say we pack our shi% and come home. Next time we go to war, maybe we should just blow shi% up and head for the house.
2006-09-22 07:35:10 · answer #9 · answered by Reddigo 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
The rest of the world cries when the U.S. does something...and blame us when we don't.
Where are they when there is genocide and starvation in Africa?
2006-09-22 07:35:14 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋