English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Ok, there are few out there that I respect. But the vast majority simply blame Bush or "greedy corporations". Simplistic at best, uninformed, lazy and herd mentality at worst. Where are you logical arguments? Where is you fiscal knowledge?

2006-09-22 07:26:00 · 14 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Politics

14 answers

I guess because hes such a pig and an easy traget

2006-09-22 09:37:12 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

There are plenty of problems that are not caused by Bush.

But Bush (more accurately, his string pullers) is behind a great many problems. Hyper-aggressive world stance. Greenspan pushing ARM loans. Those stupid tax breaks. Ever see Pinocchio? Dems won't be the only donkeys in the future. We are in big trouble. And the Bush regime has been the catalyst to exacerbate our problems.

Pretty easy for me to guess that history will not judge him kindly. A bit harder to prove.

2006-09-22 14:37:14 · answer #2 · answered by AntiDisEstablishmentTarianism 3 · 0 0

I absolutely agree with what you're saying... I don't understand it either. Bush was voted into office, and there is nothing anyone can do about it, so why complain? Support your leaders no matter how you stand on the issues. A house divided against itself cannot stand!

2006-09-22 14:40:18 · answer #3 · answered by sara 2 · 0 0

No, what are they going to nail the GOP on, a good economy, tough stance on countries that have a problem with us and want us wiped of the map, the fact that Clinton did nothing to deture terrorism except by taking names. The list can go on and on.

2006-09-22 14:32:01 · answer #4 · answered by b 2 · 0 0

No, it isn't.

Their agenda is to find everything that happens across the globe that is negative, and label it "because of Bush". They then find everything positive that happens across the globe and label it "in spite of Bush"

Regardless of the failure of the platform in 2000, and 2004 they still believe they can succussfully run on the "we aren't GW Bush" platform.

2006-09-22 14:29:38 · answer #5 · answered by Ricky T 6 · 2 0

Um wow do you just not realize what the root of problems are. However I dont like to blame Bush. I see him as a spineless wuss of a puppet who dances like hes told and says what hes told. Its pathetic how you people still believe a word that comes out of his mouth.Almost laughable really. I just dont even bother trying to convince any neo con why Im right anymore cause they have the most ridiculous comebacks.SO now I just mock their stupidity.Utter stupidity at backing this man.Stupid Stupid Stupid

2006-09-22 14:30:24 · answer #6 · answered by stephaniemariewalksonwater 5 · 0 2

Is it possible for a con to ask a question on here that isn't:
a lie, a talking point they heard on the oxy addicts show or based on a logical fallacy?

2006-09-22 14:56:27 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Yes.

However, most questions I've seen on this site ask about the war and erosion of rights. Those are Bush-specific.

2006-09-22 14:28:26 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

I agree, and it is quite old. If you can't have an intelligent discussion about the questions here then why bother logging on, your not helping anyone with blaming and accusing constantly.

2006-09-22 14:32:27 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

Because the current sitution can be most contributed to Bush and his administration.

2006-09-22 14:30:03 · answer #10 · answered by REDJR 2 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers