I understand the importance of the HIPAA laws. But - I work in a defense lawfirm as a paralegal - and medical facilities will not give up records - EVEN IF SUBPOENAED - without a HIPAA-compliant authorization. It seems to me that HIPAA laws would not apply when a person brings about a legal action where their own personal injuries are the focal point of that legal action! Is this a misinterpretation of HIPAA laws by the medical facilities - or does HIPAA make medical record document gathering so stringent that it really makes it almost impossible for defense firms to gather records & do their jobs? I think if someone is suing for personal injury - they really have waived their right to privacy when it comes to those medical records. Does the HIPAA law directly address this situation?
2006-09-22
07:15:13
·
5 answers
·
asked by
captain2man
3
in
Politics & Government
➔ Law & Ethics
the first 2 answers have totally overreacted to the question. Yes - I - and all of the attorneys in the firm I work for are well-versed in the HIPAA laws. We always seek out proper HIPAA authorization forms - and, in fact, we were the first lawfirm in our area to change our forms & tailor our demands to make sure we complied with HIPAA laws. While I certainly don't believe that someone instituting a legal action for personal injury waives their right to privacy - it does seem like the intent of the HIPAA laws was not to hinder defense counsel from being able to obtain records which are pertinent to the defense of a case. If you are in auto accident & sue someone for injury -- for the purpose of that legal action only (i.e. defense counsel) - then YOU are the one who must prove your injuries (it's not defense counsel's job to prove you AREN'T injured - it's your job to prove that you ARE)...and defense counsel should be able to obtain those records without jumping through hoops.
2006-09-22
08:40:03 ·
update #1