Vendetta against him & his much more intelligent father?
2006-09-22 05:34:18 · 15 answers · asked by ChaliQ 4 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
just pointing fingers... thats all!
would you imagine seeing him admit to public that 9/11 was his responsibility? crap, right?
2006-09-22 05:37:35 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 3⤋
911 didn't happen because Bush was in office. 911 was being planned a long time before Clinton left office. We were recieving intelligence that Al Queda was planning on using planes as missiles. However the Clinton administration, said it was impossible and never took any action. Also a lot of this information was never recorded because it was deemed impossible. Now if the Clinton admin. had taken some action, then there is a very high chance that 911 could have been avoided.
2006-09-22 13:07:38 · answer #2 · answered by Eagle 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The planning for the 9/11 attack began in the Clinton administration mostly as a result of Clinton's foreign policy in dealing with the Afghanis.
Also, Osama Bin Laden had a personal vendetta against the US because the Saudis wanted the US and not Al Quada to help with the war in the Persian Gulf back in the early 90's. Don't believe everything you hear on TV and do some research man, geez.
2006-09-22 12:37:21 · answer #3 · answered by Josh C 3 · 4⤊ 0⤋
To blame Bush that 9/11 was a Vendetta against him or his family has to be one of the most ludicrous ideas I have ever heard. I am sure that your left leaning ideology would love for this to be the truth.
But the Vendetta goes further back then Carter as most people have posted. Research history (not just the internet) and you will learn the history of this vendetta.
2006-09-22 12:50:45 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
Here is why. The 9/11 hijackers entered the US when Clinton was president...and therefore it is patently obvious that the planning for 9/11 happened as a result of Clintons policies.
If you think republicans hate liberals...just guess how much the taliban and el qaeda hate liberals!!
2006-09-22 12:40:04 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 1⤋
PLEASE! No matter who was our President, 9/11 would have happened regardless!
Why don't people understand that the terrorists were planning that attack for several years before 2001. My best guess would be late 1998 to early 1999, which is when CLINTON WAS IN OFFICE! Even if Ross Perot would have one in 2000, 9/11 would have happened anyway.
2006-09-22 12:38:39 · answer #6 · answered by Kevin J 5 · 5⤊ 0⤋
According to al Qaeda 9/11 was revenge for our sales of weapons that Israel used against the Palestinians. Also Bush never blamed Clinton, as neither do any clear thinking people bl;ame either of the men. If me and 18 of my friends decided to run through the mall shooting people and no one stopped us before we got the chance, who is to blame for the attack? You know our plans, now try to stop us. Not that easy is it?
http://www.americastruthforum.com/index.html
Please check your facts before ranting.
2006-09-22 12:54:58 · answer #7 · answered by El Pistolero Negra 5 · 2⤊ 0⤋
The reason we were attacked was not because of Bush being in office...It is because of some of the decisions Clinton made while he was in office...
2006-09-22 12:37:33 · answer #8 · answered by Tyler Durden 3 · 2⤊ 1⤋
1 - He doesn't and hasn't said that he does. WHERE do you people get this stuff?
2 - "Vendetta?"??? Class doesn't care about trash.
2006-09-22 12:48:58 · answer #9 · answered by Walter Ridgeley 5 · 3⤊ 0⤋
Every administration going all the way back to Carter is to blame.
2006-09-22 12:41:01 · answer #10 · answered by Pitchow! 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
It started with Carter and his 444 days.
2006-09-22 12:43:17 · answer #11 · answered by Jean R 3 · 2⤊ 0⤋