Should British and American Troops Stay or Pull out from Iraq?

Answer 1

Bomb attacks happen everyday in Iraq even though our troops are there.
Do u think the Iraqi army will be able to make Iraq safer after the U.S. and Britain pull troops out of Iraq?

Answer 2

for sure the wonderful result could be for the yank and British troops (and troops from somewhat some different international locations) to bypass away whilst the undertaking has been finished (i.e. an outstanding, safeguard, democratic Iraq is in place). to bypass away any incorrect way could enable the jihadists, the extremists and terrorists to declare victory. this would not purely harm the interests of the loose international, yet whilst the democratic test in Iraq fails it may desire to become a failed state and a haven for breeding much extra extremists. however the foremost question is, can the objective of an outstanding and democratic Iraq be carried out? If the respond isn't any, then it may nevertheless be extra constructive to withdraw now besides. The longer this entire Iraq fiasco maintains, the clearer it extremely is growing to be to be that little if any progression is being made. possibly now's the time to diminish one's losses and withdraw.

Answer 3

When the situation deteriorates like it has done in iraq and your just in the way of 3 feuding sides it's probably a good idea to hit the road. I don't see any good coming from staying the so called iraqi army will break off into it's religious and tribal parts when this so called govt is on it's own. I'm with senator biden on this let the country break into 3 different states and get ourselves out of there.

Answer 4

I put a similar question about the lack of support yesterday but I withdrew it. A couple of conjoined clowns suggested I ought to get some in or stay quite.

I was trying to get some action to help our troops but the feed back was pitiful.
At 83 and a vet in modern parlance, I had lots of experience of war both as a civilian in London's east end and in the Home Guard and Army. My eight year long service to my country, as they like to put it, was continuous and demanding but the couple of week-end warriors that ridiculed me knew nothing about me.
So I have come to the conclusion why bother anymore but I do so I guess I will go on trying.
There is a rude quote that states it clearly for me. Urinate or get off the pot. If you send in an army give it the weapons they need or leave them where they are at home.

Answer 5

Troopd are there. We should stay until the job is done - otherwise it's not fair on the people of Iraq to just swoop in and blow up there country then bugger off!

Answer 6

guess they have to stay until the iraqi army takes over because leaving now might allow the "insurgents" to defeat the government.

if they pulled out, however, i think some of the violence would subside because undoubtedly the occupation upsets so many.

Answer 7

We have to stay and finish the job, if we pull out now we'd be giving up.

Answer 8

tough question. years ago I would say yes, but now that we're so deep into this my opinion about it changed.

Even though I really hate how our president represents the American people, I have to say we need to finish what we started, whether it was right or wrong, we need to bring a positive ending to the stage.

Answer 9

I think the major question is "should troops go in in the first place?".

Answer 10

George Bush Sr. is the one who should have pulled out. Now it's not so easy to fix his mistake.