yesterday i heard him say "you dont invade a soverieign nation, you need the govs approval to enter"........so which is it?
2006-09-22 04:52:01 · 13 answers · asked by bush-deathgrip 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
1 - Ok.
2 - I don't know - why don't you tell us.
2006-09-22 04:54:14 · answer #1 · answered by Walter Ridgeley 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Bush is ignorant and changes what he says on a bi-weekly basis. For a year he didn't care about finding Osama, and now he tell the Pakistan President that we will go into Pakistan with or without approval! We needed Pakistan as an ally, if the President causes harm in this relationship, we have a country that already has nuclear weapons!!! Anyone with a IQ of 91 will always change what they say because they don't remember what they say!
2006-09-22 04:57:56 · answer #2 · answered by Fitforlife 4 · 1⤊ 1⤋
If the Bush administration wouldnt raid Iran upon gaining understanding of they were supporting the insurgency, there isnt a danger in hell the Hussein Obama administration ought to raid Pakistan. it truly is merely an empty threat and yet another liberal attempting to look difficult on terror who if this conflict were entrusted in 03, wouldve reduce and run by making use of now and wouldnt be everywhere close to Iraq and Afganistan no longer to point Pakistan. Democrats are unwilling to committ to protection rigidity operations for more advantageous than a million-2 years. They cant abdomen being on the unpopular aspect of a conflict and they truly cant abdomen troop loss. even although statistically we've misplaced the fewest volume of troops ever given the era of time we've been engaged.
2016-11-23 15:12:28 · answer #3 · answered by ? 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Both. As with most of his decisions, whichever makes him sound better to undecided voters. He was born with his foot in his mouth and continues to spew whatever he thinks we want to hear. No President has ever stepped on the Constitution the way he and his cronies have. If you dare suggest following our laws, somehow you are labelled as un-patriotic or neo-con or liberal or a tree-hugger. For a great nation that in just a little over 200 years to go from nothing to a world power, the envy of most nations, based on the premise of truth, democracy to stoop to the levels of oppression this administration is asking us to swallow where soverign nations have no say in allowing a military invasion is unfathomable. Please get out and vote in November. Fear does not build a nation and that is all this administration knows, just like any other bully. 9-11 was bad, very bad but in 200 years we have been attacked once and to continue to live in fear because of it, means they have won. Osama has not been seen since before 9-11, he may be buried under rubble in Afghanistan for all we know. He is/was a billionaire who may have been smart enough to pre-tape dozens of possible messages for dozens of possible scenarios and unless we decide to be the nation we strive to be and no longer allow our leaders to preach fear and begin to take care of our own domestic problems, Bush and his successors will continue to bring our great country down to the point where we are no better than the very people we "fear". Open your eyes America...
2006-09-22 05:45:32 · answer #4 · answered by Bob D 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
If Osama is found somebody will have to kill him in order to preserve the "myth" of 9/11. Can't have the patsy runnin around. You know, like Lee Harvey?
2006-09-22 05:41:47 · answer #5 · answered by Edward K 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
He flip-flops on that issue constantly! He also flip-flops on torture. In '04 he said in a speech at the UN that the US was working to stamp out torture and abuses to human dignity wherever they be found, and now he's pushing a bill that allows all forms of torture! He made that speech condemning torture and degradation the very day that (later in the day) the Abu Ghraib story came out!
He flip-flops on all morality-based and ethics issues...well...I should say he says one thing and does the opposite. He condemns unethical actions while he's performing those very actions himself.
2006-09-22 04:56:41 · answer #6 · answered by corwynwulfhund 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
If they did know for sure that that pig is in Pakistan - they got my blessing to invade.
2006-09-22 05:08:25 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Osama is in N.W.F.P, of Pakistan. U.S will have to send troops. Pak president has to give secret consent.
2006-09-22 04:56:10 · answer #8 · answered by J.SWAMY I ఇ జ స్వామి 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
If someone killed your family member then they ran into my house and I refused to let you come in and get them what would you do? We know the cops would invade my house in an instant but lets suppose they were not involved. How long would it take before you went and got a gun and or a posse, came in and got his *** out of my house?
2006-09-22 05:04:53 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
Let's ask you: What would you want him to do if Osama were found in Pakistan?
2006-09-22 04:54:25 · answer #10 · answered by rustyshackleford001 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Fantastic.. I have dealt a couple of blows on this one. You can imagine what the NEOCON response was.. Bush basher, Anti-American.. Terrorist Lover...
Not one single cogent or adult defense of a pathetic position. Good luck on this one.
2006-09-22 05:02:44 · answer #11 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋