2006-09-22 03:35:38 · 13 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Yes. She'd make a great candidate.
And when she lost in a humiliating defeat perhaps she'd just return to California and keep her socialist agenda to herself.
2006-09-22 03:40:32 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 6⤊ 2⤋
She can run, but I doubt she'd get many votes outside of San Francisco, Greenwich Village, Ann Arbor and a few other places.
She appears to focus on leftist social and economic policies and is WEAK on defense. Then again, she wouldn't satisfy the left either. I believe she and her husband have many investments in the large corporations liberals criticize, and I bet she takes the same corporate contributions and supports the same corporate-friendly legislation that most folks in government do. I don't need my taxes raised, and judges appointed who think they are kings.
The less charitably spirited might also mention her freakish facial appearance, due to apparent facelift mishaps. One rude person said that if she has one more facelift she'll have a goatee! But I try to stick to issues. :)
2006-09-22 11:18:02 · answer #2 · answered by American citizen and taxpayer 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Absolutely! These far-left barking moonbats need as much national exposure as possible. Only then can people start seeing how dangerous these loony lefties are to this country.
They would see that the Dem party is overrun with nutjob leftists like Howard 'Yeaaarrrggggghhh' Dean.
2006-09-22 10:49:20 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
She would make a horrible candidate. Her entire career is based on extreme left ideas and partisanship to the max.
I'm a big-time democrat AND EVEN I wouldn't vote for her.
We don't need leaders interested in having their party on top.
2006-09-22 10:42:28 · answer #4 · answered by aliasasim 5 · 3⤊ 1⤋
No she's had too many bad facelifts. This is the criteria the intelligent American public, typified by people like you, will judge her on.
2006-09-22 10:46:54 · answer #5 · answered by ? 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Sure.That would be an easier victory for Republicans than what Hillary would even be!
2006-09-22 10:48:39 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
No, she also would be too divisive, both within the party and nationally.
2006-09-22 10:38:21 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 0⤋
I think you should, since you seem to be more of a windbag than any politician I've ever heard.
2006-09-22 11:23:54 · answer #8 · answered by sylvia627 1 · 0⤊ 1⤋
No.
Kicked back to level 1, I see...
2006-09-22 10:47:05 · answer #9 · answered by john_stolworthy 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Nope. Although I don't know which Dem I would WANT to run for president! ;-)
2006-09-22 10:36:52 · answer #10 · answered by Liz Q 2 · 3⤊ 1⤋