A bad business decession for TNA as well as poor choices for Lugar & Bagwell. Each has had their own legal problems over the years & TNA will regret for making such poor choices of signing up hasbeens who should just retire & go away.
2006-09-22 04:06:11
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Its a real shame that TNA has signed these two, especially Bagwell. I think TNA should let the young talent like Daniels, Styles, Abyss, Williams, Sabin, Dutt, Lethal, and Shelley "carry" the company. I don't understand why a company with so much young talent would hire all these washed up losers. TNA really has the ability to be the new face of pro wrestling but poor decision making keeps holding them back.
2006-09-22 04:32:30
·
answer #2
·
answered by Mephisto 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
My honest opinion...I'm not a huge Bagwell fan but Luger deserves a break. He's really been trying to put his life back together since the whole Elizabeth/jail/drugs period, and he's cleaned up his act. I remember when Bagwell first joined the old WCW and he used to be a good talented wrestler...but once the "Buff Bagwell" persona of the NWO days started going to his head, he became a pompous, self-centered jerk...that's why WWE didn't want him after the takeover, and he's been floundering around the foreign and indie circuits since.
2006-09-22 05:49:23
·
answer #3
·
answered by answerman63 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
I noticed that TNA has signed all of the wrestlers that used to wrestle for WWE/WCW. IMO, these are all of the washed up wrestlers who nobody wants to see anymore.
I mean Lex Luger and Buff Bagwell? They must have been desperate to sign those two. These two are totally going to bring down TNA. And TNA wonders why it can't compete against the WWE. You don't see the WWE bringing in these wrestlers for a reason!
And besides, I thought that Bagwell was making porno movies now?
2006-09-22 04:47:17
·
answer #4
·
answered by DaleJr#1Girl 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Luger sucks but Buff might be good he was always entertaining hopefully Luger doesn kill any of the knockouts (RIP Elizabeth)
2006-09-22 03:14:11
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
yea i just found that out on the tna news website. i dont know if its a bad move as long as tna gets a higher status i dont care!
2006-09-22 03:10:43
·
answer #6
·
answered by baby 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Yeah they're old
2006-09-22 03:28:31
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋