I don't hate TNA by any means but why not. Actually its not entirely like Samoa Joe. Umaga (Jamal from 3 minute Warning) is just as large but he does not have the in ring talent and does not talk on the mike. Really the only thing that is similar is the undefeated streak and really many wrestlers go through this when they debut (or debut a new gimmick).
2006-09-22 02:29:13
·
answer #1
·
answered by CJ B 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
i think of Tna is making a Michaels Myers version of Samoa Joe. so a approaches i admire the character and picture its imtimadating, yet i think of the character needs to do alont greater previously it could get frightening. Samoa Joe and Umaga at the instant are not correct, yet from what I heard their solid associates in actual life.
2016-12-18 14:52:06
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
There not at all. Just because they're both Samoan doesn't make them the same. Umaga has no in-ring skills and doesn't even speak. While Samoa Joe has charisma and no manager.
2006-09-22 02:32:58
·
answer #3
·
answered by sage_surge 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Because TNA isnt that big right now and can trick fans that dont watch it into thinking Umaga is great but he isnt 1/4 of the wrestler that Joe is JOE IS GONNA KILL YOU
2006-09-22 02:59:43
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Coz they like making fun of gimmicks they think are stupid. Remember Gillberg? I actually do think Samoa Joe is a stupid character and deserves to be made fun of by WWE. Not that he isn't a good wrestler. He just has lame mic skills
2006-09-22 03:28:04
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Honestly, WWE has been stale on ideas for a long time. They just keep reviving old stereotypes. Like when the gulf war was going on, they had the Sheik. I used to watch it religiously, but its more like a stupid soap opera than a sport.
2006-09-22 02:31:31
·
answer #6
·
answered by jagerchick80 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
The WWE is trying to improve on the character to get better ratings for TV.
2006-09-22 04:15:39
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋