Would you trade L. Fitzgerald for P. Burress? Burress is on my team and I was offered Fitzgerald. I already have A. Boldin on my team. Would you make that trade? Im not sure if having two recievers from the same team is a good idea, but then again they are both two of the leagues best.
2006-09-22 01:38:35 · 15 answers · asked by tays232003 3 in Sports ➔ Fantasy Sports
I would likely not make that trade. Burress is the number one WR if NYG and is bound to have a huge year as Eli Manning gets more comfortable.
While Fitz is nice, having Anquan Boldin makes him off limits to your team. Arizonia is going to put up points this year but if they get shut down in certain weeks then it will probably mean a lose for you. I think you should stay diversified and keep Burress.
2006-09-22 02:08:21 · answer #1 · answered by Dr. L 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
If you already have A Bouldin... Do not do the trade. You dont want to recievers on the same team on your team. (if the team gets shut out you lose points. Burress is the Main Target of Manning while Fitz is number 2 with Burress. There Value is about the same But I would go with a better QB and a Better WR with a bit more looks
Keep Burress
2006-09-22 10:47:23 · answer #2 · answered by Platlander 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I would take that trade. Burress is good but he lacks the consistency of FItzgerald. Fitzgerald will continue to get open every week because of Boldin and Johnson. Take Fitzgerald before the other team changes their mind
2006-09-22 08:45:35 · answer #3 · answered by boredmanatwork30 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Fitzgerald is not a go-to #1 receiver like Burress, don't pull the trigger.
2006-09-22 10:03:19 · answer #4 · answered by Tony R 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Normally I wouldn't want two WR from the same team but Fitz and Bolden are the exception. Make the deal. Burress is up and down. Fitz is solid!
2006-09-22 11:22:30 · answer #5 · answered by Drunk365 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
that is probably a fair trade...i think they will end up with similar stats. as for the plax haters saying toomer is stealing catches....boldin doesn't do the same for fitz? i would have to give a slight edge to burress since the G-men have a more balanced offense. arizona is finding out it doesn't matter who your RB is you need a decent O-line to have any running game. a balanced offense leads to more first downs which leads to more opportunity. plus i tend to favor clear cut #1's.
2006-09-22 10:40:33 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
If you can get Fitz for Burress straight up, get off of Yahoo Answers NOW and accept before he pulls it back.
Burress started hot last year too. But you can already see he's getting doubled and Eli is looking at Toomer (11 catches last week).
Fitz is the man. Get him.
2006-09-22 10:18:05 · answer #7 · answered by mikep426 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I would take that trade. Sure it may not seem like a good idea but ur basically trading a wr picked up in da 4th or 5th rd for 1 that might not get to u in da 3rd. Neither of them seem to be underachieving so having those two rack up points every single week especially in point-per-reception leagues would work wonders for you. Hopefully u have enough depth at wr during that bye week though.
2006-09-22 09:12:48 · answer #8 · answered by Luigi 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I would do it. There are only 2 teams worth having 2 receivers on, the Colts and the Cards. Fitz is a stud, and with Arizona's passing attack you are in for some great weeks.
2006-09-22 17:52:53 · answer #9 · answered by Mad Skillz 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No way. Burress is going to light it up this year. He has Eli Manning throwing to him. The situation in AZ is shady... think about it. You know Warner is going to either get hurt or just blow it. That leave Navarre and Leinhart. KEEP BURRESS!!!
2006-09-22 11:15:22 · answer #10 · answered by Mr Class 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋