I figured since these same war dodging chicken hawks decided it was better to ignore Bin Laden and go after Saddam then maybe the same conservative, inbred, traitors would do the same if we get hit again.
If Al-Qaeda attacks us will the nutcase conservatives just pick another country to take it out on? Will it be Canada? Maybe the Fiji Islands. I heard Iceland is lookin good.
And will the same conservative traitors be gung ho for war, just as long as they don't have to fight it? Seems like the following conservatives (and moron Clinton) will be the first in line to make sure their family members won't have to fight the good fight. See the example below. http://www.nhgazette.com/news/chickenhawks/politicans_platoon/
http://www.nhgazette.com/news/chickenhawks/barking_head_brigade/
2006-09-21 17:51:21 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
The US government has already threatened Pakistan;
U.S. threatened to bomb Pakistan unless it helped war on terror: Musharraf
Thu Sep 21, 5:50 PM
"The U.S. threatened to bomb Pakistan "back to the Stone Age" after the Sept. 11 attacks if the country refused to help America with its war on terrorism, Pakistani President Pervez Musharraf says. In an interview with CBS's 60 Minutes, the Pakistani leader said the threat came from then-deputy secretary of state Richard Armitage. Musharraf said it was delivered to Musharraf's intelligence director. "The intelligence director told me that [Armitage] said, 'Be prepared to be bombed. Be prepared to go back to the Stone Age,' " Musharraf said.
"I think it was a very rude remark."
But Musharraf said he reacted to the threat in a responsible way.
"One has to think and take actions in the interests of the nation, and that's what I did."
Pakistan was a strong supporter of Afghanistan's former Taliban regime, but switched sides after the Sept. 11 attacks. Musharraf also said the U.S. made some demands that were "ludicrous," including one to suppress vocal support in his country for terrorism in the U.S.
"If somebody's expressing views, we cannot curb the expression of views," Musharraf said.
He said he was also irked that the U.S. wanted Pakistan to turn over border posts and bases for the U.S. military to use against the Taliban in Afghanistan."
2006-09-21 20:29:05 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
As a Chicken Hawk, I find Canada is just too doggone close to home. Iceland is beautiful, but too small and too cold and not really a challenge. Fuji is so far away and full of extremist. I'm going to nominate a country in south America. Chili maybe, or Ecuador ...
Peace my Angry Friend.
2006-09-22 01:00:00 · answer #2 · answered by lollipop 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
True, it baffles me too.
The problem with democracy is that very few good decisions are made. They always walk the pointless midline, spout lies, and never really get anything done.
If the wars are really required. If it is time to quash dissonance in religious and political belief, then make the case and do it.
If not, do not lie. Do not bring a political bent to serious matters.
It is sad, dangerous, lacks integrity, and is a recipe for disaster.
2006-09-22 00:52:51 · answer #3 · answered by Jeremy D 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Ok, first of all my computer alerted me to a security problem on the sight, so I wasn't risking anything to check it out. Second of all, you can't completely believe any site that has an agenda 100%. They all do it...distort the facts, up or lower percentages, etc. Third, you definitely need to take a chill pill...you are way too angry and sarcastic. When you come across with that much attitude, the information is lost in the rhetoric.
2006-09-22 01:01:19 · answer #4 · answered by butrcupps 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋
I'm conservative and I have been over there...have you? It's amazing how many people, liberal or conservative can go on such rants ...I fear to say America and I mean America...not conservatives or liberals became a wounded animal on 9/11...what do wounded animals do? Strike out at the nearest thing...Instead of being angry and hateful just vote....I see neither conservatives or liberals as evil...both make poor choices under duress...thats all it comes down to....
2006-09-22 02:08:24 · answer #5 · answered by loofa36 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I agree with those here that say you seem to be an angry man. It's hard to take anything you say seriously. I never go to the sights you post, I'm sure it is all left wing propaganda. Because there is no clear logical question I guess I have no answer for you.
2006-09-22 01:35:32 · answer #6 · answered by Cinner 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
no Canada is safe , the reason give why they planned to attack Iraq rather than Afghanistan was the Iraq had better targets, when Powell pointed out the Iraq didn't actually have anything to do with it, the decided they would attack Afghanistan first
2006-09-22 00:54:35 · answer #7 · answered by brinlarrr 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
... probably Venezuela... now that chavez has pissed off Bush and they have oil... they are probably working up the "WMD argument" as we speak...
you know all those Osama - Chavez ties right... hahahaha... he has almost as many as Saddam.... hahahaha
conservatives will love it...
all the "islama-facists" in south america you know... "new front in the war on terror"
2006-09-22 01:18:41 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Gawd what a bunch of condescending rhetorical garbage!!!!
Isn't it bedtime on your planet???
2006-09-22 02:30:16 · answer #9 · answered by Dear Blabby 4 · 1⤊ 1⤋
shut ur fool assssssssssssssssss up.
2006-09-22 00:53:09 · answer #10 · answered by Dont Trip 2 · 1⤊ 1⤋