Neither. Bush is too flippin' stupid to undertand the rules of the game, and Kim will keep threatening his own pieces.
2006-09-21 15:34:52
·
answer #1
·
answered by Stuart 7
·
2⤊
1⤋
It would have to be Kim Jong II because Bush won't do anything about North Korea. But since Chavez and Ahmadinejad have been getting so much attention the last few days look for NK to test another rocket that will land in the sea close to Japan. Its a risky stunt but sure to get him back in the headlines as the most batshit crazy dictator out there.
2006-09-21 15:42:51
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Well, I've heard that Kim Jong-Il enjoys playing chess, so undoubtedly would win...especially considering the fact that Bush is incapable of planning ahead, and this is neccesary to win at chess!
2006-09-21 15:36:50
·
answer #3
·
answered by corwynwulfhund 3
·
2⤊
0⤋
Neither because they are the "kings" & they will inevitably find some pawns to play on their behalf. The game will probably involve many players before any side achieves victory. If the North Korean player is deemed to be "losing", he'll either be shot or sent to hard labour camp whilst being replace by another.
If the American seems to be losing, he'll probably be left alone. If he seems to be winning, he'll be labelled as a baby killer or a rapist, not by Bush, but by some of his compatriots...
2006-09-22 06:02:30
·
answer #4
·
answered by Kevin F 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
I suppose anyone is a "warmonger" who decides to hit back.
That would make beaten wives into warmongers.
Yes, saddam struck US planes, and invaded sovereign nations, and violated UN resolutions, and the UN refused to enforce them.
Yes, the Taliban funded the strikes on 9.11.
Yes, Lebanon and Syria attacked Israel.
Yes, Iran supplied arms and soldiers and funds.
Yes, if you call Bush a warmonger, you are clearly not paying attention as to who started the wars, which were: Islamic fascists.
2006-09-21 15:38:37
·
answer #5
·
answered by askthepizzaguy 4
·
0⤊
2⤋
Bush offers only reactions,, not responses
2006-09-21 15:37:17
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
Kim doesn't even know where the board is, but your characterization of my President leaves much to be desired. Your parents obviously fell down on the job or didn't know themselves how to show respect to their betters.
2006-09-21 15:36:02
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
3⤋
Kom bong bot Bosh
2006-09-21 15:39:28
·
answer #8
·
answered by longroad 5
·
0⤊
1⤋
It would be a tie
2006-09-25 12:33:57
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋