Now that we have seen Suri Cruise, do you think she is Tom and Katie's daughter? For me she has some resemblance to them, but not enough to be their biological daughter...do you really think she's their daughter? Or just the daughter of one of them? Maybe they adopted one that looks "like" them???
2006-09-21 15:00:57 · 17 answers · asked by FashionSuika 2 in Entertainment & Music ➔ Celebrities
For the ones saying "who the f*** cares", if you don't, why the hell are you in here answering this question!? Real answers, please, people.
2006-09-21 15:12:54 · update #1
word has it that katie wasn't even pregnant at all. and that her public appearances while she was supposedly "with child" were all choreographed to make an attempt to prove that tom is challenged in the reproductive area. well, he is challenged and she was just putting on a show. and poor baby is adopted. so that makes her a rich baby. all i can say is good for little suri and shame on katie. i don't have an opinion on tom. and oh, good for nicole too.
2006-09-22 00:55:37 · answer #1 · answered by Marcus 2 · 1⤊ 2⤋
I do think Suri is Tom and Katie's baby. I think she looks just like Tom. You should also consider all the genetics that goes into making a baby. If their own gene pool is large, she may not look all that much like them but is still their child.
2006-09-21 15:48:46 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 0⤋
I think she is their bilogical daughter because if she were adopted, it would take more than 4 1/2 months to finalize all papers. I think that she looks a lot like her mom, though ... but never the less she is a beautiful baby.
2006-09-21 21:23:00 · answer #3 · answered by bsantos0523 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Geez people are such @$$ holes
YES I think she is their daughter. She looks more like Katie IMO. Stunning baby. People are never satisfied. Now that they've seen her and she DOES exist....suddenly its not their baby? WTF is the matter with you people and where do you come up with this ****? I highly doubt they were able to find a dark haired blue eyed baby (notice they've been saying she looks like that from the day she was born). Jerks are everywhere. Something like that would not have stayed under wraps.
2006-09-22 14:17:04 · answer #4 · answered by kisstar21 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I think she unmistakably Katie's daughter - did you see those eyes and mouth? But I don't know about Tom being the father...
2006-09-21 15:12:21 · answer #5 · answered by vetgirl77 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
My guess would be that she is. But didn't that first picture that FINALLY came out look like they put a wig on her? Maybe that's why it took so long to put a picture out - they didn't think she had enough hair! But they were under so much pressure to present the child, and they couldn't stand the thought of photographing their own child with less-than-perfect hair, so they went rummaging through the prop department!
2006-09-21 17:55:23 · answer #6 · answered by DangerMom 3 · 1⤊ 1⤋
That is definitely Cruise missile progeny with a lot of "scream free help"<---Ya sure! from Ms Katie.
O_- So my answer is yes
2006-09-21 15:04:50 · answer #7 · answered by momsapplepeye 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think it's theirs. She looks like Katie more than Tom, but I can't really tell til she got bigger...
2006-09-21 16:39:13 · answer #8 · answered by meetha 4 · 2⤊ 0⤋
yes
2006-09-21 15:04:20 · answer #9 · answered by shelbs<3 t.m.a.s.k.s 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
They grew her from a kit they got from a mail order catalog.
2006-09-21 15:03:03 · answer #10 · answered by jasondne 2 · 3⤊ 1⤋