English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2006-09-21 14:14:16 · 15 answers · asked by L.J. 1 in Social Science Economics

15 answers

No, I think sales tax is a rip off anyhow.

Born free and taxed to death.

2006-09-21 14:22:02 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1 3

Yes they should - for convenience of the consumer, if nothing else.

Pretty much in all states that currently levy a sales tax, there is a corresponding use tax. The use tax is levied on the consumer for purchases that were not taxed by the seller on the original sale.

In English, that means that if you buy something through a catalog or over the internet and the seller did not charge sales tax on the purchase, you are legally liable to the state for the use tax on the purchase. Not that many people are actually aware, or follow the law, but that is the way it is now. By having the seller collect the tax on the sale, it relieves that burden on the consumer of figuring out how much they owe and remitting it directly to the state.

2006-09-21 14:25:21 · answer #2 · answered by Road Warrior 4 · 0 0

With the internet being worldwide, and merchants being based anywhere in the world; just exactly how would you make sure every purchase was properly taxed?
If you buy something while you are in a state with no sales tax, and take it to a state with sales tax...do you pay the tax upon arrival?
I didn't think so.
I live in a non sales tax state and we get a LOT of business from people across the border that have sales tax.
People flock here to buy furniture, major appliances, just about anything that does not require a state issued title (like vehicles) to avoid that 7% tax.
So why would you tax someone who buys online?

2006-09-21 14:26:01 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

In maximum states, information superhighway sales, and all different sales of actual very own propery, are concern to the two a sales or use tax. information superhighway sales are taxable in state the place the shopper is located. If the internet supplier has "nexus" with the shopper's properties state (i.e., it has actual presence - an place of work, workers, property, located in that state), it would gather the sales tax from the shopper and remit it to the state. If the internet supplier does not have nexus, as is frequently the case, it won't gather the tax. that may no longer a tax-loose sale, even however. If no tax is amassed, the shopper is had to self-examine a use tax and remit it to the state. purchasers not often do this because of the fact states have few ability of enforcements. as a consequence hundreds of thousands of dollars of taxes bypass unremitted. there's a attempt noted as the Streamlined sales Tax undertaking to convince Congress or the U. S. suitable court docket to permit states to require distant sellers to gather sales tax of all information superhighway sales, even distant purchasers, and do away with the actual presence prevalent of nexus. The undertaking demands the states standardize the sales tax regulations, which might relieve the confusion and administrative problems linked with requiring distant sellers to gather and remit tax. It replaced into this confustion that brought about, in part, the suitable court docket in Quill v. North Dakota to mandate that there be actual presence with the intention to require distant sellers to gather.

2016-12-12 12:39:16 · answer #4 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

actually, sales tax is a remnent of localized government, and should probably be discarded overall in favor of a Value Added Tax. Barring that, the basic rule is that sales tax is charged for items sold for use in the state where it is sold. To charge tax outside this premise goes against the notion that this is a local tax.

2006-09-21 16:35:19 · answer #5 · answered by world traveler 3 · 0 0

Definitely. Why shouldn't they? You can usually get away with not paying sales tax by finding an internet company that is in a state that does not charge sales tax.

2006-09-21 14:23:07 · answer #6 · answered by GEE-GEE 5 · 0 1

Personally I think they shouldn't but they are taxed if they are being delivered to a state that has sales tax.

2006-09-21 14:24:27 · answer #7 · answered by G M 5 · 0 0

i think it should be, otherwise internet based retailers would have an unfair advantage over shop based ones.

2006-09-21 23:50:55 · answer #8 · answered by mr. me 3 · 0 0

I don't think so, we are taxed enough.

And ESPECIALLY no where near in this way! http://savetheinternet.com/
Save the internet!

2006-09-21 14:23:42 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

yes....sometime they mention all inclusive, then there is no additional charges. They also charge forwarding charges

2006-09-21 14:22:37 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

fedest.com, questions and answers