Why Did the U.S. Government Plan Terrorist Attacks against It's own Civilians?

Question

State Terrorism:

Operation Northwoods, or Northwoods, was a 1962 plan to generate U.S. public support for military action against the Cuban government of Fidel Castro as part of the U.S. government's Operation Mongoose anti-Castro initiative. The plan, which was not implemented, called for various false flag actions, including simulated or real state sponsored terrorism (such as hijacked planes) on U.S. and Cuban soil. The plan was proposed by senior U.S. Department of Defense leaders, including the highest ranking member of the U.S. military, the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Lyman Louis Lemnitzer.

http://encyclopedia.thefreedictionary.com/Operation+Northwoods

Why can't you people understand, that the government is very capable of committing such acts of terrorism against its own people.

Neocons.... does the past haunt your attempt to hijack the minds of the present?

Well I have good news for you my Neocon friends... Not whilst we're around! =)

Answer 1

to senior citizen ...who made this into a republican vs democrat....oh that's right you did.

rep or dem ..same **** different hole

why did they plan attacks on their own citizens, becuase there are factions within our gov't that don't give a **** about americans, their loyalty isn't to this country but to the secret orders and societies they are part of.....many of which have as a goal, the eventual destruction of america and institutiing a One world government which they will control

Answer 2

"The plan was proposed by senior U.S. Department of Defense leaders, including the highest ranking member of the U.S. military, the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Lyman Louis Lemnitzer."

That is a false statement. The President is the highest ranking member of the military. Your data is flawed. And, where does freedictionary.com get its information from? It doesn't sound like a reliable data source.

Answer 3

Wow, your crack dealer sells some good product, please post his pager #.

Ok history professor, in 1962 real freaking Soviet subs carrying REAL nuclear weaponry was cruising along to launch sites on the Cuban island. That was no war game, no false flag action and no state sponsored terrorism (unless the state we're referring to is the USSR).

On 9/11/01, four planes crashed onto US targets or soil, and there is no evidence brought forth or discovered since that suggests ANY complicity by US agents or agencies.

You are afraid of the true enemy of the state, and feel the easier battle is to vote out the conservative element in the White House, whose policies haven't been the greatest, but are FAR from diabolically murderous and callously treasonous.

The DoD is chock full of military jugheads (current and ex) who are PAID to come up with crazy scenarios and think the unthinkable. IT DOESN'T MEAN that the sitting presidents or sec-defs take the most laughable suggestions and put them into action. You are free to peruse the DoD or DoW files for the last century and see what kind of crazy nonsense they suggested to the administrations they answered to. There's some serious wacky stuff considered. But one wacky event WASN'T given its due (the Bojinka Plan) and THAT plan was the one that did us in. That plan was concocted in the Middle East and Phillipines and THAT plan was executed almost flawlessly by suicidal, homicidal, illegal Muslim aliens. NOT your USofA.

If you continue to look inward for blame and responsibility, you give the true and openly identified enemy more and more time to plan, fund and execute terrorism. Did we plan the Iran Hostage Crisis? The Marine Barracks attack? 02/23/93? The Khobar Towers? The USS Cole? Bali? 7/7/05 ? Madrid?

Your wild conspiratorial rhetoric is cute to read whilst bored at home and pissed off at everyone else but your misinformed self. But you do no honor or justice to your nation and those that died that day, by placing the blame incorrectly and without basis, on America.

Check yourself.

Answer 4

there are various many back room situations like this They stick to alongside the lines of The Maine and Gulf Of Tonkin incidents one concern to remember however The plan replaced into drawn up in 1962 Who replaced into it lower back that replaced into in cost in 1962? Damnedest concern approximately stone throwing and glass properties Did all of us else word that the fats guy published the video that he claims won't be able to be got here across after looking it on an imprecise internet site noted as YouTube The stooping merely keeps getting decrease and decrease all the time

Answer 5

Real ID Act
Patriot Act
North American Union
Police State
1984
VeriChip

Answer 6

That is about as true as the bible and the koran put together. It is only true as a metaphor. Sure, the US government is responsible, ultimately, for the destruction of the world trade center buildings, they should have seen that coming a long time ago. No offense meant in using the analogy of the bible and the koran, please excuse me, but they too are more than what they seem

Answer 7

It didn't. The premise of your question is false.

Bad plans are proposed by government agencies all the time. They are shot down all the time as well. What you refer to is not proof of anything but bad judgement on the part of the author.

Answer 8

um, why can't you understand that those attacks never happened. I am going to seriously ask you a question. Go to lolloosechange.com, and watch that movie. You obviously watched the other one, at least give this one a chance.

Answer 9

This happened while President John F. Kennedy (Democrat) was in office.

Answer 10

Uh... Dude... 1962... JFK, a democrat.... not a neo-con... You really should take your head out of your butt and take a breath once in a while.