DS= two screen touch screen :0 damn Touch screen picto chat
(medium ps1 graphics) mario
PSP=mp3 video mp4 internet Wi-Fi Multiplayer analog early ps2 graphics(well im not exactly exagerating but you should play pursuit force) socom
some
2006-09-21 12:47:47 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous in Entertainment & Music ➔ Other - Entertainment
i do.. have both
2006-09-21 12:50:46 · update #1
PSP by far but Mario is a big sacrifice
2006-09-21 12:49:08 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Seriously, the PSP. The DS is not a media device and I'm kind of mad the DS is even in the same category with the PSP. The PSP is a multimedia device which includes: Movies, Internet Browsing, Music, Photo Sharing and Holding, RSS Feed Reciever, Online Music Streamer, Music Video Player. Oh yeah and it also plays PS2 Quality Graphical Games. The PSP is beyond the DS. In my opinion, the "DualScreen" was created for the children and the PSP was created to attract the teen and young adults generation. The PSP suits everything this generation likes to do. And if touch screen is "innovative" technology has to really buckle down and find something new. I love my PSP and right now no portable device can replace it right now.
2006-09-21 19:33:32 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
DS all the way! It has way better games, and the touch screen control is just amazing. Also, it can play music, movies, etc. just like a PSP via an attachment that you can buy on eBay for around $60. Okay, I'll admit that DS's graphics aren't quite as good as PSP's, but is that seriously all that matters? Overall, I'd say the DS can do everything that the PSP can and more, for a better price.
2006-09-21 13:01:42 · answer #3 · answered by eyanyo13 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
It relies upon what you decide on- in case you want a conveyable gadget with imaginitive/ quick play video games that you merely take everywhere with out irritating about it- get a DS- purchase the lite one, it really is efficient. in case you want a do all of it gadget, which facilitates you to video exhibit videos, play song, and surf the cyber web- as well as play fairly respectable video games, then a PSP is for you. different issues to think about are- in case you purchase a PSP- you'll maximum likely desire to purchase a huge memory card- for the song, yet another battery- the PSP's existence is kinda short, and a shielding case to save the that efficient exhibit secure. also, you could in reality watch videos by making use of procuring UMD's, it truly is you could in reality watch on your PSP and value more advantageous than DVD's. once you've deep wallet, and care more advantageous about efficient aspects than video games- then i advise a PSP. in case you care about video games, and %. up and play-ness- yet do not ideas the sub-par pics (compared to PSP) - then the DS is a thanks to bypass.
2016-11-23 13:58:24 · answer #4 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
PSP is better than any other video game console that is out now. it can like play movies, music, it has internet, u can download all sorts of stuff on there. its like and ipod and a playstation put in one! dont buy the DS. those suck. anything nintendo sucks.
2006-09-21 12:51:34 · answer #5 · answered by rockstarjestersmoothrider 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
DS. PSP needs HD and extra and all that stuff. and it defeats the purpose of a video game. Its not supposed to do 30 million other things, your supposed to have fun, and you have more fun with a DS.
2006-09-21 12:49:53 · answer #6 · answered by JtoJ 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
DS, far better games and control. Its always been my philosophy that game systems are meant to play games. Any bells and whistles are just trying to cover up essential problems with the actual gaming features
2006-09-21 12:50:39 · answer #7 · answered by DonSoze 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
PSP!!!!!!!!!!
2006-09-21 12:49:38 · answer #8 · answered by let the speakers blow your mind 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
just get both and stop bitchin.....
2006-09-21 12:49:52 · answer #9 · answered by boythunder99 1 · 0⤊ 1⤋