how can i contrast and compare social change in functionalism and conflict ,and symbolic interaction theory?

Answer 1

Look up a gentleman named Lev Vygotsky, a Russian social scientist who examined how society "norms" affect childhood development and a gentleman named Piaget who says that the way a child's personality forms is a set process that goes through various stages and is the same for everybody because it is inherited. For example, under Vygotsky a child raised under communism will have a personality suited to living in a communisit society and find change very difficult should communism disappear. Piaget would say that since one of the stages of childhood development is learning how to absorb and adjust to change, a child raised under Communism would be able to adjust over time should his or her society change from being a Communist society to a Capitalist society.

Answer 2

This topic can be a whole new doctoral dissertation. SI, really broadly involves examination of the emergence of meaning, and the way that meaning works in the context of social interaction. Which is how things take on a certain meaning, in a certain context. along with the first answer, I would recommend getting a copy of the Handbook of Social Psychology, for a condensed view of at least SI.

Answer 3

In the works of Stone, a predominant concept is the concept of cultural sexuality. De Selby[1] suggests that we have to choose between social realism and capitalist narrative. But if postdialectic capitalist theory holds, the works of Stone are postmodern.

An abundance of discourses concerning a mythopoetical totality may be revealed. Therefore, the primary theme of the works of Stone is not situationism, but presituationism.

Several desemioticisms concerning the presemanticist paradigm of expression exist. In a sense, Sartre promotes the use of neoconceptualist libertarianism to modify and analyse culture.

Sontag uses the term ‘the cultural paradigm of reality’ to denote the common ground between sexual identity and society. However, the characteristic theme of Bailey’s[2] critique of social realism is a neodeconstructivist whole.
2. Constructive nihilism and the predialectic paradigm of discourse

If one examines the predialectic paradigm of discourse, one is faced with a choice: either reject the presemanticist paradigm of expression or conclude that the significance of the observer is deconstruction. The subject is contextualised into a structural narrative that includes language as a totality. In a sense, Bataille’s analysis of the predialectic paradigm of discourse states that narrativity is capable of significance, given that consciousness is distinct from narrativity.

In the works of Stone, a predominant concept is the distinction between ground and figure. The example of the presemanticist paradigm of expression which is a central theme of Stone’s Heaven and Earth emerges again in JFK, although in a more self-referential sense. Thus, many discourses concerning the role of the artist as writer may be discovered.

If one examines subdialectic deconstructivism, one is faced with a choice: either accept social realism or conclude that consensus must come from the collective unconscious. Lacan uses the term ‘conceptualist narrative’ to denote the bridge between culture and society. In a sense, in Platoon, Stone deconstructs social realism; in Heaven and Earth, however, he reiterates the pretextual paradigm of discourse.

The subject is interpolated into a social realism that includes art as a reality. But an abundance of discourses concerning the presemanticist paradigm of expression exist.

The main theme of the works of Stone is not, in fact, sublimation, but postsublimation. It could be said that the premise of the predialectic paradigm of discourse holds that government is impossible, but only if cultural subtextual theory is invalid.

Any number of theories concerning the absurdity of capitalist sexual identity may be revealed. Therefore, the subject is contextualised into a social realism that includes sexuality as a paradox.

Lyotard uses the term ‘the presemanticist paradigm of expression’ to denote the role of the poet as writer. In a sense, the characteristic theme of Parry’s[3] model of capitalist narrative is a mythopoetical reality.

The rubicon, and hence the failure, of the presemanticist paradigm of expression intrinsic to Stone’s Natural Born Killers is also evident in Platoon. However, the subject is interpolated into a Batailleist `powerful communication’ that includes language as a whole.

1. de Selby, R. F. R. (1980) Social realism and the presemanticist paradigm of expression. And/Or Press

2. Bailey, U. ed. (1992) The Stasis of Class: The presemanticist paradigm of expression and social realism. Schlangekraft

3. Parry, Z. A. (1988) Social realism and the presemanticist paradigm of expression. University of Georgia Press

The essay you have just seen is completely meaningless and was randomly generated by the Postmodernism Generator. To generate another essay, follow this link. If you liked this particular essay and would like to return to it, follow this link for a bookmarkable page.

The Postmodernism Generator was written by Andrew C. Bulhak using the Dada Engine, a system for generating random text from recursive grammars, and modified very slightly by Josh Larios (this version, anyway. There are others out there).

This installation of the Generator has delivered 2271395 essays since 25/Feb/2000 18:43:09 PST, when it became operational. It is being served from a machine in Seattle, Washington, USA.

More detailed technical information may be found in Monash University Department of Computer Science Technical Report 96/264: “On the Simulation of Postmodernism and Mental Debility Using Recursive Transition Networks”. An on-line copy is available from Monash University.