Shows you just how much they (Democrats) speak out of both sides of their mouth, doesn't it?? I've been trying to tell people this for quite awhile. There's numerous facts and records that show and prove that Clinton knew that Iraq had WMD's. Not only that, but there were ties to al Qaeda that were strong. Capturing them now isn't something new, they were already there. Can you imagine if Kerry would have been elected....or worse yet, if Hillary is!?!?
Great links!! Too bad the Democrats weren't smart enough to read them before answering. Made themselves look pretty stupid.
2006-09-21 16:19:30
·
answer #1
·
answered by HEartstrinGs 6
·
0⤊
1⤋
You need to dig a little deeper for some truth behind the 2 web sites before posting them. In the 1st web the writer talks about Kosovo as if we the American invade there with out U.N. aprovel will lets see I do beleive the Action was taken by NATO which the U.S. is a part of and dose not need the aprovel of the U.N to take any legel aor military action.
In the 2nd web are quotes from the Democrates that were repeated by the Republicans from the same infromation received from the same
Cicret Service Center. I do think when your going to ask a question of this laditude just first check out for any hiden senteces read between, behind ,below. and above the senteces before gaging in this forum OK.
Thanks
2006-09-21 19:54:57
·
answer #2
·
answered by Don C 2
·
1⤊
1⤋
Oh, c'mon, your memory is TOO LONG, your patience TOO SHORT. Just bend over and be a good Democratic, will you?
And Republicans, you didn't need the ridiculous WMD excuse to invade Iraq for regional natural and political resource control. America is built on fossil fuels, and any and all measures to irradicate tyrants like Khameini and Hussein are justified for they pre-empt and truncate these radical secular and religious regimes from their anti-US designs.
I am confused why France, Germany and Russia are treated so kindly, when they enabled Iraq to skirt UN sanctions and enriched Saddam to no end. These are likely the same culprits providing economic and military assistance to Iran in the face of US opposition to their nuclear ambitions. Why don't we pursue the TRUE enemy of the state?
Bush fibbed, a bit, but didn't have to. Saddam violated all sorts of UN resolutions, tied or not to WMD's and the US acted on UN resolutions which called for enforcement. This time, Rice will have her proof of Iran's nuclear material development, and when she throws it at the UN and they again do nothing, there won't be any fingerpointing at the administration for doing a better job at packaging and selling a call to war.
Enough is enough, you can't dance with a klutz all night and expect your pedicure to last. Let's get this swift kick to the groin going already and push these would-be oil barons back to the 7th century they so dearly cling to.
2006-09-21 19:35:24
·
answer #3
·
answered by rohannesian 4
·
0⤊
1⤋
Bush lied because he said he knew Saddam was getting uranium supplies from Africa and he stated that Saddam already had nuclear research laboratories. Intelligence did not ever confirm everything Bush said to justify going into Iraq.
2006-09-22 19:21:32
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
Yes Bush is the problem to the whole world and America is the worst country in the world - is that what you think? Quit believing what the liberal media tells you and WAKE UP. If you don't believe me, just go live ANYWHERE else for at least 2 years. I guarantee you'll be begging to come back home.
2006-09-21 19:27:01
·
answer #5
·
answered by Random Precision 4
·
2⤊
2⤋
Bush lied about what, wmd , yes they do exist no they are not too old - nerve gas is stored in what is called a binary containment which keeps them good forever. If they did not have a nuclear program why did they have nuclear scientists.
2006-09-21 19:26:57
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
2⤋
Why read links? Are you that lazy that you can't express yourself. You posted no question. I'm not going to do the work for you.
It isn't like the internet is a source!!!!!
2006-09-21 19:42:10
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
2⤋
He wanted that war has no casualties so that Americans will not oppose his foreign diplomacy policies.
2006-09-21 19:28:08
·
answer #8
·
answered by FRAGINAL, JTM 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Sad, but true.
2600 brave Americans DEAD in Iraq.
Thank Bush.
2006-09-21 19:25:57
·
answer #9
·
answered by Villain 6
·
1⤊
3⤋
Thanks for the links. Isnt it funny how these morons thought you were tooting the DNC horn when you were actually handing their own words back to them.
You have to remember, most liberals arent into that fancy book learnin stuff and dont read very well.
2006-09-21 19:34:54
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
2⤋