2006-09-21 11:57:06 · 12 answers · asked by Tommy G. 5 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
"Us liberals" are the ones who have been working our butts off for years trying to make sure that NO dictator has weapons of mass destruction.
OK - to give you just one example. Where were you or your friends in the late 1980s when "us liberals" were busy protesting about the fact that Saddam Hussein had used chemical weapons and gassed more than 5,000 people at Halabja? That's right - your friends Ronald Reagan and George Bush Snr were busy selling Saddam weapons and chemicals including nerve gas and anthrax.
So, well done, you. I was fed up in 1988 when no-one in power wanted to look at pictures of dead Iraqi kids Saddam had killed, and I'm fed up now when I see people like you parading yourselves as the scourge of dictators. Don't ever whine about kowtowing to dictators here again.
2006-09-21 12:12:19 · answer #1 · answered by gellhorn 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think the problem is not enough Americans have nukes .If several Americans could buy them and use them we would not be having this conversation would we .
These weapons should not exist and must be destroyed around the world . We do not need more we need none .Iran must be stopped and the way to do that is give them one of our own on American soil .
Let them send some people over and then sit in a missile launch bunker with the ability to launch the weapon .They may only target people that have attacked them or their country using an explosive device causing the death of more then 10 people .Like wise next to them let everyone else have one also .this is fair and make sure the guidence system does not allow it to be used on america or any of our allies in peace .
All nations disarm including Israel .They can have a site here also ..
2006-09-21 19:09:45 · answer #2 · answered by playtoofast 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Should it be illegal for any country to research a method that can either produce electricity or nuclear weapons? We can have all the guns we want, as well as the crime rate go up dramatically. No one should have nukes, but they do and they exist.
2006-09-21 19:04:13 · answer #3 · answered by Enterrador 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I dont understand the relationship between nukes and guns.
2006-09-21 19:06:34 · answer #4 · answered by diaryofamadblackman 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
we don't fool!
we think that the president should not lie to the world so he can get more oil when he is the one who is not helping people make electric cars!
do you know why there is no action in darfur? because they don't have allot of oil! bush was using the fact that Saddam is evil to start a war over oil!
ok stupid do you get it now?
2006-09-21 19:06:42 · answer #5 · answered by Layne [Capricorn Sister] 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The Liberals are so happy that Iran may get nukes to use on Israel and us.
It makes them dance and gives them "happy feet".
2006-09-21 19:03:45 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
because they think that, oh guns are wrong, but we have the right to bear arms, if they take the guns away, then only the crooks have guns. that's the problem with England.
2006-09-21 19:04:09 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Why? Because liberals live by one knee-jerk reaction after another. They still feel like it's 1969 and how 'hip' it is to stand up against 'the man', no matter how stupid it makes them look.
2006-09-21 19:02:27 · answer #8 · answered by Pancakes 7 · 2⤊ 1⤋
why do republican thinks a president should be impeached over a misdemeanor and not over a lie that killed tens of thousand of innocent civilians and 2691 American soldiers?
2006-09-21 19:06:24 · answer #9 · answered by AlfRed E nEuMaN 4 preSIDent 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Your nuts.
We don't believe in thugs having nukes.
And NO ONE is trying to take away your guns..unless your a felon.
2006-09-21 18:59:15 · answer #10 · answered by Villain 6 · 1⤊ 2⤋