English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

It has been disclosed that Richard Armitage Threatened Pakistan with Bombing after 9-11 and brought President Musharf into colisan for war on terror.Now Mr.Bush I think must produce Osama Bin Laden if he has to win election in November.What is your view .Can he take on Pakistan while still bogged down in Iraq.

2006-09-21 11:48:55 · 15 answers · asked by Dr.O 5 in Politics & Government Politics

I meant if Republican party has to win the election.

2006-09-21 11:59:24 · update #1

15 answers

I think President Bush would attack anything. I do not trust anything that he says. If he say's that he is not going to start a war with Pakistan then I would look for a war to start with them soon. He is also not just in Iraq. We have troops all over the globe. He has spread our military too thin. Our troops need to come home and the President needs to be impeached. He is heartless.

2006-09-21 11:58:16 · answer #1 · answered by angelsforanimals 3 · 1 2

India-Pakistan intelligence chiefs conversing at length on hotline accompanied by using Defence Ministerial point talks and then a 6 am emergency cabinet assembly all element to a minimum of one direction. my very own feeling is that the Pak government is thoroughly held ransom by using the terrorists who've a secure homestead in Pakistan. India could initiate commando operations into Pakistan merely like the people are doing and flush out the lairs of the terrorists. If India invades Pakistan right now, it could have the international leaders backing it. Pakistan right now is on it rather is knees and can't have the money for a conflict spanning greater desirable than 5 days. it is the time to strike and wipe out the incapable government there. Thereafter, the Indian government could grant protection to the Pakistani voters who've none from their very own government. Pakistan voters are our brothers and function a precise to stay a secure and wealthy lives. yet Pakistan as a rustic could be wiped out and be made an element of India the place all could detect a tolerant homestead.

2016-12-12 12:35:17 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

The truth of the matter is that we will probably be the generation that has to deal with a nuclear war regardless of what anyone does. I have always believed this since I was a child. I am so fed up with politics that I don't even know what to think anymore.

2006-09-21 11:55:40 · answer #3 · answered by D 3 · 1 1

That won't happen, they have been at least mostly cooperative. The days after 9/11 we were ready to throw down with anyone harboring terrorists, not that it was acceptable, but it happened.

2006-09-21 11:52:56 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 3 0

Yes. Didn't you see the flashes of light just above your house earlier? Bush can't even RUN in November! Go back to sleep!

2006-09-21 11:53:10 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 2 1

President Bush isn't running in any election.

2006-09-21 11:59:10 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

As long as u.s. bushes( presidedts) are friend with busharrafs,
u.s. won't attack pakistan.

2006-09-21 15:48:25 · answer #7 · answered by opal 1 · 0 0

Does Pakistan has any oil? If it doesn't, he will surely not

2006-09-21 12:26:35 · answer #8 · answered by me 6 · 0 0

No do not think G.W.Bush will attack Pakistan

Pull your head out of your @$$ and dont be such a fool....

2006-09-21 14:21:44 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

Not top priority. Iran is next. You can almost bet money on it.

2006-09-21 11:54:02 · answer #10 · answered by oceansoflight777 5 · 1 1

fedest.com, questions and answers