Why did more than HALF of the U.N. applaud Chavez's diatribe against DUHbya and his criminal administration?

Question

Was it indicative of Duhbya's failed foreign policy?


http://www.buckfush.com/images/bush_Police_State.jpg

Answer 1

Because he conveyed the message that they were too afraid to deliver.

Well, at least we didn't elect a monket at the zoo as the President of the United States.

Answer 2

I keep hearing libs say criminal administration and that Bush should be impeached, But none can ever talk about true criminal acts that anyone in the administration has done.

Answer 3

Is that what happened? Were you there to see this first hand? Chavez also said the UN was broken. Maybe they were applauding that. Or maybe they were entertained because he said Chomsky was dead, and the man is alive and well... There are too many variables here, really.

Answer 4

Almost all the world with exception of Australia England Canada and some Eastern European countries envy America.

Answer 5

If we're to believe that Americans can find themselves among the top 8% in the world with respect to personal wealth or assets, then we can roughly estimate that more than half of the other nations in the world either envy, despise or violently oppose our economic, military and social standing in the world.

This has been the case for decades, so whether we're attacked under Bush (9/11/01) or Clinton (2/23/93) or Reagan (10/23/83) or Carter (11/4/79), the 'failings' of American foreign policy in general have been in the underestimation of the violence and corruption the REST of the world is willing to undertake, in order to maintain a grip or expand their power.

The link below is ONE Venezuelan's take on the chubby dictator-to-be who likens himself as a white-collar Castro, and champion of the people (which people, yet to be determined).

Venezuela and Iran would be (and soon will be) such minor players on the global stage if it were not for their vast oil reserves. As more and more oil is productively dug up out of the Gulf of Mexico and American/Canadian Rockies, the glut on the markets in the next two decades will further relegate these back water countries to the real back waters (begging for foreign aid to keep their people from starving, a la N. Korea and other so-called tough guys in the face of US 'imperialism').

Chavez is a military guy who uses the military to feather his fat nest. He believes himself to be a long-standing dictator with no threat to office, because he's consolidated his political power, fragmented the opposition, successfully nationalized much of the oil production in Venezuela and catapulted his international stature (much like Saddam did in the Middle East) by thumbing his nose at the U.S. HOWEVER, unlike Saddam, Chavez owes a great deal of his power and influence to the military. Where Saddam could have someone's head on a spit in record time, Chavez has to continually shuffle and cajole conflicting interests within the military in order to maintain power (or risk another coup).

Diatribe explains Chavez's comments best. A blowhard in a popularity contest, he was applauded for lambasting a sitting US President, and the only response from Rice or Snow was "we won't dignify that with an answer". America has become spineless, unwilling to use hard-earned influence and power to squash little commie bugs like Chavez who threaten the livelihood of millions of South Americans by 'dancing around the devil' that is America. The U.S. will likely never invade Venezuela per se, but we have ample and sufficient experience in dealing with hot-heads like Chavez, politically and otherwise. What benefit he gets from 'sulfur-laced' soliloquy is hard to calculate. I'm sure what he's really hoping for is to jump from 5th to 4th in the oil production ranks, as soon as his buddy Ahmadinejad gets his weapon, uses it, and relegates Iran to the Stone Age (much like Musharraf claims we were going to do to Pakistan on 9/12).

Democracy and free markets work for democratic and free people. And those posting on this website would soon yank out an eye than live in the pissholes these men so corruptly run. Chavez had his day in the sun, but goes back to civil and economic unrest that no amount of nationalized oil will fix. He's a one trick pony and the circus will soon be over. Shame so many Americans find solace in the comments of a political neophyte with absolutely no regard for his biggest commercial customers. Those that don't know business, lose the business, and that's where Chavez, Morales, Kim and the Ayatollahs are surely headed. Can't wait to read the final chapter in V for Venezuela. Adios Hugo, have fun at the gallows.

Answer 6

Confidence is down with the President and his policy on many things, i.e the Iraqi War, rising energy costs, and federal spending in general...

Answer 7

No, not really. You'd see their attitudes change rapidly if they needed money or other forms of aid from the US. That's what kind of fair weather friends we have in this world.

Answer 8

Why could they additionally be prosecuted? it incredibly is merely ridiculous. have been you interior the protection rigidity? Did you visit conflict? nicely, i grew to become into interior the protection rigidity, and that i did visit conflict...voluntarily. I wholeheartedly have faith in this conflict. I went to Iraq, Kuwait, Oman, United Arab Emirates, Qatar, Djibouti, and Afghanistan. the human beings like what we are doing. each and every of the crap you notice on television is a lie. it fairly is spun as much as be some thing it is not for the liberal media. i grew to become into in a position to work out satellite tv for pc photographs of Iraq and that i observed what seems to be WMDs, then 2 weeks later they have been long gone. That information is not categorised, yet you human beings nonetheless do not want to take heed to. human beings like Cindy Sheehan supply the protection rigidity and the U.S. a undesirable call. I fought for human beings such as you. Ignorant and swept up on the bandwagon on what you think of is a righteous reason. Our united states grew to become into geared up on conflict. conflict is nice for the financial device. weapons producers can hire greater human beings, the protection rigidity employs greater enlisted and civilians. heck, my super aunt is an outdated woman, yet she nonetheless works ina production unit that makes our tents. You human beings have not any thought what authentic risk-free practices is. you would be able to think of enormous brother is on your corporation, yet once you do not have something to cover, then who cares. I advise, in case you fairly listened to what Obama grew to become into asserting for the time of the election you may have heard that he needs to do away with our rights to submit to palms and needs to regulate the internet. Oh, yet you think of Bush grew to become into on my own interior the full listening in on you component. Bush can't do something on his very own, duh. Congress had to lower back in spite of he needs to bypass. i don't understand why you blame each and every thing on him whilst the retarded Democrats have had administration of each and every thing in Congress. Why do not you throw some hate mongering their way? And via the way, Obama grew to become into an admitted cocaine consumer. this means that if he wished to attempt to enlist interior the protection rigidity, not even the marines could take him. Ha, ha. He could not additionally be a gun-toting jarhead, not to point out a secure practices clearance! Now he's going to run the prepare? supply me a injury.

Answer 9

Don't they applaud every speaker? Isn't it polite to applaud and if you don't agree with the speaker, you don't show up for it? Nice try, though.

Answer 10

Gee, you think your question shows any bias?

It was indicative of those countries position on US foreign policy.