English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

11 answers

Neither one is better. It is all a matter of preference.

2006-09-21 11:40:42 · answer #1 · answered by Just me 2 · 0 0

Personally I am cut, and have a nice size. Although I have friends that are uncut and they say that it is so much better. More feeling....

2006-09-21 15:44:21 · answer #2 · answered by Chris B 2 · 0 0

Uncut is natural the way it was meant to be.

2006-09-21 12:28:45 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 2 0

Yeeck! Cut is mutilated. There is this gross scar where the skin belongs. Ugh. Natural is better!

2006-09-21 11:46:46 · answer #4 · answered by Maple 7 · 1 0

lmao .. better to handle ?? you make it sound like a test drive ?? what do you say.. oh no i dont want it ... its not cut ??? stupid dork.. btw i love uncut

2006-09-21 13:21:34 · answer #5 · answered by brieana_lee 1 · 1 0

I woould say uncut.

2006-09-21 18:58:01 · answer #6 · answered by buddy 2 · 0 0

Aesthetically speaking, cut.

2006-09-21 11:41:21 · answer #7 · answered by bignug1116 2 · 0 1

It depends on you and the way they perform. Have you tried both?

2006-09-21 11:42:18 · answer #8 · answered by pits_me1 3 · 0 0

Obviously you wouldn't know.

2006-09-21 11:40:08 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

say what?

2006-09-21 11:39:39 · answer #10 · answered by joalteeth 3 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers