when there are so many people that need taking out first,
Who would you hunt???
2006-09-21 10:33:17 · 22 answers · asked by Georgie's Girl 5 in Entertainment & Music ➔ Polls & Surveys
I have my ticket, will meet at station in zurich, i will be the one carrying a toblerone.
2006-09-21 11:30:38 · update #1
I have the mercury bullets secured! Don't forget?
Switzerland, check timings!
2006-09-21 11:04:00 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Now that would make life interesting. Have a season for hunting people. I'd take out a few movie stars first like the little runt Tom Cruise. Guy needs to go.
2006-09-21 10:41:27 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
We don't really hunt animals in this country anymore, we breed them for slaughter and human consumtion. It's not the same thing. If we were to hunt, I agree, there are several humans I would take out before any innocent animal. Can't say who though, would get thrown off the site!!
2006-09-21 10:37:21 · answer #3 · answered by helen p 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I agree with you that there are many people who need taking out, but a gun is so unsatisfactory - I'd rather hit them with a car. Especially those jaggoffs in dahntahn Pittsburgh who haven't yet figured out what crosswalks are for - those are the idiots I'd hunt/intentionally run over.
So, in answer to your question: we hunt animals instead of people because it's less damaging to shoot animals than to hit them with a car and because they can't sue us for damages in civil court.
2006-09-21 10:44:58 · answer #4 · answered by badseamstress 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Population control and safety measures for farmers etc. Anything other than that is CRUEL!! Personally, I would hunt down every single person who had been released from prison early after raping or murdering people and children.
2006-09-21 10:37:34 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
i disagree with hunting and all the abuse on the animals, they deserve to live just as human, maybe it would be better to control some dangerous animals such a lion or hippopotamus but not through killing for fun or joy
2006-09-21 11:48:58 · answer #6 · answered by Jubei 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Wait a minute R U talking about animals or people. Your not planning to hire a hitman R U?
Aniamls:Ferrets
People: child molesters
2006-09-21 10:36:50 · answer #7 · answered by Lenneth's true challenge 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
in some areas i guess they do it for overpopulation purposes and when you consider what is running rampant in the meat you buy in stores its just as safe to hunt wild game maybe even heathier if you consider the exercise these people are getting for running around thru the woods
as far as taking out people i will leave that up to a higher being thats not our decision
2006-09-21 10:37:48 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Beause you can't justify killing a human as easily as you can an animal.
Humans have responsibilities to self and others, animals don't and such aren't a huge loss since there needs to be population control of certain animals. Besides, they taste good.
2006-09-21 10:35:12 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
We hunt animals for vanity, no need for it at all, killing defenceless animals is not on, so I would hunt the hunters with a bigger gun and more ammunition and see how they like it.
2006-09-21 12:37:13 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
We hunt animals to punish them for wrecking our cars when they run in front of on coming traffic.
2006-09-21 10:48:22 · answer #11 · answered by Neb 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋