English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

I think So

2006-09-21 10:28:08 · 21 answers · asked by macy6l 2 in Politics & Government Politics

21 answers

Bush is a dangerous combination of ignorance, arrogance and fanaticism. I was born in '75, and he is easily the worst, most dangerous president of my lifetime.
His followers seem to be the same ones who would call for book burnings and, eventually, people burnings. None of them has a clue about what made this country great.

2006-09-23 14:02:45 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

When historians sit down and analyze the Bush fiasco, they will determine that a president who lied the way this one has, who has taken a record budget surplus into a record deficit, who has been responsible for thousands of deaths and who completely ignored the needs of Americans hurt by a natural disaster, was indeed the worst in history. Historians usually think of James Buchanan as being the worst. Move over James - make way for Georgey Boy!!!

2006-09-21 10:52:55 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

How can you possibly ask somthing like that. The after 9/11 there where 5 attemts at a massive terror assult on US civilian targets and 0 thats right zero successes thanks to Mr. Presidents policys. Bush had the balls to disregard what liberal suicidal fags had to think about him and protected them anyway. He is not only the best President this country has ever had but he is also a god fearing good man. If you think other wise you have the right to think so because of that "worst" President of all time.

2006-09-21 10:37:51 · answer #3 · answered by USAToTheDeath 1 · 0 2

He's right down there with the worst. He may actually go down in history as the worst because of the war and the biggest deficit in history. Then, there's the matter of war crimes and corruption.

To those still whining about Clinton, a wonderful president, just remember: Clinton lied, no one died. Bush lied and over 100,000 have died so far.

2006-09-21 10:31:59 · answer #4 · answered by notyou311 7 · 2 1

And I hate to say it, but we probably have yet to see the worst of him. Just wait till he finds a way of starting world war 3.

2006-09-21 10:53:40 · answer #5 · answered by oceansoflight777 5 · 1 1

Well he is very close. How many thousands has he had killed? And he'll say he is doing it for you and that he is just a regular guy just like you. I wouldn't be surprised if at the end of his term something blows up so he can declare martial law and stay longer.

2006-09-21 10:38:35 · answer #6 · answered by miss moni 2 · 1 1

You win the lolly pop. Not only the worst but dangerous as well.

2006-09-21 10:36:11 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

The worst ! It was the peanuts salesman ! Jimmy !
The best, may be Ronald.
Bush ? I don't know, only the future will say it later !

2006-09-21 10:44:36 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

No, Warren Harding, and Herbert Hoover were the worst.

2006-09-21 10:32:03 · answer #9 · answered by Villain 6 · 0 2

yes didn't hear what chaves said yesterday about bush , he cal ed him the devil, yes bush is worst

2006-09-21 10:35:05 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

fedest.com, questions and answers