English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

just something i wonder about wouldnt AFO alien flying object be more to the point, have you better ideas or polite intelligent comments only

2006-09-21 09:55:37 · 8 answers · asked by Anonymous in Entertainment & Music Polls & Surveys

i have spotted a UFO and thought i don't know what that was - i checked and it was a harrier jump jet on manouvers but i didnt spot it and immediatly go OMFG IT'S ALIENS I'm on about the one we spot when you say that and KNOW ITS NON TERRESTRIAL

2006-09-21 10:05:32 · update #1

ok i will add i was only told it was a harrier that doesn't mean it was but it is the most likely explanation, it may have been different plane and they would prefer to tell me it was a harrier since i couldnt identify it

2006-09-21 10:10:58 · update #2

8 answers

If you saw something flying that you didn't know what was, it would be, to you, an unidentified flying object. If, however, you realized, after a time, what the object was, it would no longer be unidentified. If the government saw an unidentified flying object, it would be nothing, because they wouldn't tell us if they did see something!

2006-09-21 09:58:26 · answer #1 · answered by The Nana of Nana's 7 · 0 0

heads up:

"ufo" stands for "uneconomical federal operation"

some people think it should stand for
"unwarranted federal operation"
but, they'd be wrong
'cause
no matter WHAT the cost,
we need the feds. up there
intercepting afos


thanks for keeping an eye out

2006-09-22 01:35:17 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

true...if you call it an "unidentified flying object" then you have just identified it because now it is classified as a UFO

2006-09-21 16:59:54 · answer #3 · answered by A Pirate's Life For ME ;) 6 · 0 0

mmmmmmmmmm! thinking of an intelligent answer mmmmmmmmmmmmmm... sorry still thinking mmmmmmmmmmmm eerrrrrrrrrrrmm yes i will call it an ufo and feel well chuffed to have spotted it

2006-09-21 17:04:26 · answer #4 · answered by gal-next-dr 4 · 1 0

It's just like why do they call someone who is obviously guilty a "suspect" It hasn't been officially proven yet.

2006-09-21 16:59:10 · answer #5 · answered by martin h 6 · 0 0

never really thought about it but i suppose you have a point

2006-09-21 16:58:24 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Just because you know what it isn't, doesn't mean you know what it is.

2006-09-21 16:57:26 · answer #7 · answered by Blunt Honesty 7 · 0 0

I think so

2006-09-21 16:58:55 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers