First he says , Pakistan is a sovereign nation and we wont attack it
Yesterday he tells CBS he will act unilaterally. What do we believe?
http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2006/09/20/terror/printable2028007.shtml
2006-09-21 09:37:18 · 12 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
What to believe? That the Decider will remain steadfast and true to form, and make the wrong decision, as usual.
Mculasso - Sorry, but the facts contradict your beliefs. Bush said at a recent Rose Garden press conference, that he would not go ANYWHERE into Pakistan unless the sovereign government of Pakistan gave him permission. Now he's made an about face and says he can act without permisssion, unilaterally.
2006-09-21 09:39:11 · answer #1 · answered by TxSup 5 · 1⤊ 1⤋
ya know, the Republicans have only a short time left in Presidential office, but, the Dems have no platform... and, third party candidates don't seem to fare well... http://lp.org would be the best choice...
But, are you sure you want to stop hearing lies? I mean, every President has lied... And, no matter what we say to educate you, the claim is that everyone still lies!
NEWS FLASH! The empowered rulers will seem to be mighty to the un-empowered weaklings who grovel at their feet!
2006-09-21 16:45:34 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
GW said, when asked if OBL was in Pakistan and it was known for sure, would he send troops into Pakistan to get OBL and GW said that they would take the steps necessary to capture OBL. You are not listening. If he had said a few days before this question that Pakistan was a soverign nation and we would not go in without that government's approval are you not hearing the words or are you wanting to hear something that was not said. Don't you think, and I do not want to strain your brain, but don't you think that ONE OF THE STEPS NECESSARY WOULD BE TO GET THE PAKISTANI GOVERNMENT'S APPROVAL TO GO IN????????? Comprendo?
2006-09-21 16:53:35 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
It amazes me how an uninformed "person" such as yourself can make a stupid statement and a bunch of mush brained sheep chime in how right you are.
I would venture to bet that not a one of you took the time to read or listen to his entire speech. You get your news from bleeding heart liberal newspapers like the New York Times or Wash. Post or TV news shows like CNN
Use your brains and find out the facts for yourself because then and only then does your opinion really matter-anything less and youre little more than a parrot
2006-09-21 16:51:59 · answer #4 · answered by pdudenhefer 4 · 0⤊ 2⤋
The link says he'd go into Pak to get Bin Laden if intel showed he were there. I guess you don't want him to get Bin Laden.
2006-09-21 16:52:45 · answer #5 · answered by rustyshackleford001 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Nope.
Like in Silence of the Lambs ..."hes got a real taste for it now"
2006-09-21 16:38:17 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
When you are politically astute and know all the facts, even the ones the liberal press won't print, then maybe, maybe you will be qualified to second guess the Pres and the State Dept.
2006-09-21 16:40:23 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 3⤋
Bush never said he would attack pakistan. Acting unilateraly doesnt have to mean attacking it.
STOP BLAMING BUSH
2006-09-21 16:39:55 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
hes prob not going to cause elections in november
2006-09-21 16:38:56 · answer #9 · answered by nodaybuttoday 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The only time he does not lie is when his mouth is shut.
2006-09-21 16:43:23 · answer #10 · answered by pelister56 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋