Good question. Probably yes, but there is also the possibility that his opposition is enboldened by the lack of speedy success and thus more vocal, making it seem more people oppose the war in Iraq than initially did.
2006-09-21 09:04:59
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
Seems like it was destined to fail from the beginning. The invasion was created from a pack of lies very cleverly done by the V-Prez. Cheney. There were a number of experts who tried to tell Bush/Cheney team actually was a warning the entire plan could backfire and start a civil war in Iraq. Looks like a civil war is raging right now. Bush could had been a world hero by capturing Bin Lauden but he had his own agenda. History will show him to be pretty much a moron. Wish I was wrong but he did not ask me a thing about Iraq.
2006-09-21 10:31:58
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Now if the War was over and he could declare total victory he would be immensely popular because then his policy would show to be a great success. We know this is not the case and things are not going to improve to achieve what Bush and his people promised about the length and accomplishments of the War.
2006-09-21 09:13:22
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
If pigs flew, if money grew on trees and would still buy stuff...
ifs forever infinitum. The Iraqi Crusade was and is a cover for theft from the American and Iraqi people. Anybody seen the missing (minimum) $8 billion per the GAO?? Down with Dictator Dumbya!!!
2006-09-21 11:11:11
·
answer #4
·
answered by rhino9joe 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
Wow. What college district is that? Presidnet George W. Bush prosecuted the conflict in Iraq for numerous motives. the single maximum widley understand and least understood, advert to do with weapons of Mass Destruction. maximum human beings think of that the belief grew to become into to circulate inot Iraq and discover vats of weaponized botulism or almost finished nuclear gadgets. the certainty is way less concrete--Iraq had made consistent efforts to stymie inspections and had on no account supplied an entire accounitng of their WMD supplies. there have been such supplies that have been time-honored to be in Iraq in 1992 and in 1998, with the aid of 2002, the question grew to become into what had passed off to those materails--what have been destroyed and how, the place have been they, ought to any of or no longer that's confirmed? Hussein had additionally given lots help and help to terrorists. We have been engaged in Afghanistan for extremely almost a 365 days and it grew to become into time-honored that al Qaeda individuals have been fleeing--between the secure havens they have been fleeing to grew to become into Iraq--partly the invasionwa approximately denying those havens and struggling with help to different terror communities to boot suhc as Hamas and Hezbollah.
2016-10-15 06:40:21
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Maybe, maybe not.
You have to remember that we Americans are some of the most impatient people in the world. And the media seems to have a bad case of ADHD. They jump from one thing to the next, trying to get more attention than their rival sources. And they think that people love drama, so they're covering all the stories about opposition to Bush.
And then you have to realize that the general public is extremely gullible, ill-informed, and easily manipulated.
The entire Anti-War movement is 99% made up of hype created by the media.
2006-09-21 09:10:03
·
answer #6
·
answered by Souris 5
·
2⤊
1⤋
If there was a plan and we went in, did what we had to do, whip a little democracy on them, left and the country flourished, he'd have great numbers.
However, this is just another in a series of failures, both real and perceived, that indicate a lack of commitment and follow-through for his administration
2006-09-21 09:05:59
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
The problem is Bush thinks that Iraq is just off the coast of the Isle of White in the UK. Every knows that he has no idea of who and where people are.
2006-09-21 09:04:33
·
answer #8
·
answered by rogerglyn 6
·
2⤊
0⤋
Of course it would.
If it had all been done properly when Iraq invaded Kuwait, none of the problems today would have existed. It was over before the job was finished to pacify the saudis, who wanted the west's intervention.
2006-09-22 11:19:13
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
why would individual favour a mass killer? Its not a question of if the war ended earlier or lesser people died but it boils down to the fact that a war had been initialiased by Bush and this definately makes him unpopular
2006-09-21 09:07:43
·
answer #10
·
answered by kk84 2
·
1⤊
1⤋