Islam.Quran revealed nearly 1400 years ago describes correctly the Earth's shape,The moon having no light of its own,The Sun's motion,human embryo's development stages,water cycle and many other facts which could not have been known at the time by any human being.
Rather than being prejudiced one way or other if you check things up with open mind you will find its true.
2006-09-21 13:15:54
·
answer #1
·
answered by palmreader 2
·
1⤊
1⤋
None without manipulation and interpretation. A religious belief system is founded on "accepted truths" (e.g. a belief in a deity or deities) for which there is no rational proof... this runs contrary to scientific observation where the process must be fully explained, understood and documented.
Definitely not Scientology... you should read Russell Miller's unauthorised biography of L. Ron Hubbard ("Bare Faced Messiah"). Scientology is a fusion of the pulp science fiction written by Hubbard and clever business practice whereby adherents are locked in by paying for more advanced therapy courses. Similar to the old idea of "buying indulgences".
Many scientists are religious but have to use a variety of arguments to justify the conflict... "God gave me a brain to further my knowledge of his world"... is a common one and after the schism between the catholic and protestant church, protestantism encouraged the translation of the bible into languages other than Latin to enable followers to read and interpret the text.
In summary, no religion seems to fit the bill, but you can always use the vagueness of the fundamental principles to rationalise it in your favour. Religion should have no place in scientific experiments as it encourages assumptions.
2006-09-21 16:37:25
·
answer #2
·
answered by tattooed.dragon 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Probably buddhism or scientology. They're both pretty abstract, which is a good thing for a religion in this age of scientific discovery. Christianity and islam don't fare so well, and things like hinduism and wicca are in even worse shape (hinduism mostly survives through existing in developing countries where the general public doesn't have much scientific knowledge).
2006-09-21 08:29:14
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
In my opinion a new religion should be created that would be compatible with science,this in turn would evolve into a solitary religion and hence peace on earth.
Thank god I'm a atheist.
Little Goliath
2006-09-21 08:33:36
·
answer #4
·
answered by K 2
·
1⤊
0⤋
I believe all religions accept what can be proved scientifically - it would be crazy not to. Many people believe that Christianity and science are incompatible, but that's nonsense. We know that God created all things, including the "big bang", and that He has controlled evolution. However, we believe that mankind is unique and did not evolve from other forms of life, although we probably looked different at various stages of development.
2006-09-22 08:58:14
·
answer #5
·
answered by Malcolm 3
·
0⤊
1⤋
faith and reason, Fides et Ratio is the between the contemporary description of a confident answer from Catholic Christianity. that's in English translation on the vatican cyber web website vatican.va It describes how technological awareness and faith are 2 strategies to discover fact. The strategies are distinctive, yet because of the fact they are the two examining the certainty, they can't come to disparate conclusions. for occasion, if somebody claimed that marriage grew to become into out of date because of the fact of scientific study, the Church (and maximum human beings) must be skeptical. while technological awareness shows how witchcraft isn't actual, the church replaced the way it taught approximately dealing with misfortune and laid low with epidemics. because of the fact scientists want fetal stem cells from aborted fetuses, does no longer mean that scientists are coaching human morality. that's in user-friendly terms a fact, they want them. while the Chrurch teaches that the relationship between God and human beings is that of author and creature, the are no longer coaching historic information nor scientific information. that's a fact, that's the relationship. technological awareness teaches us no longer something regarding the relationship with God; that's outdoors the appropriate use of technological awareness.
2016-10-15 06:38:36
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Any religion that admits that science seeks truths based on experience, observation, and empirical evidence, not faith, and doesn't try to intervene and say that science is attempting to usurp some higher power's "purpose". Any religion that understands that science and religion are essentially two different things. This leaves out the Judeo-Christian religions.
2006-09-21 08:29:53
·
answer #7
·
answered by Kurt 2
·
1⤊
2⤋
Reverent Agnosticism.
2006-09-21 08:28:39
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
hinduism - 12,000 years ago when the atlantis race was alive and well in this ole universe the indians of the west also had and mastered similar technology but that was all lost to due to some mass event. in the christian bible there is mention of firey charoits only once or a few times in the hindu bible just choose a text and there is mention of these events because it is well documented verbatum and not changed over time to suite ones wishes
2006-09-21 08:36:53
·
answer #9
·
answered by Sean Batson 1
·
0⤊
1⤋
Hi. Any religion that is in agreement with observation is compatible.
2006-09-21 08:23:15
·
answer #10
·
answered by Cirric 7
·
1⤊
1⤋