Should god be extremely powerful by human standards though not omnipotent or omniscient, would he somehow not qualify as god?
Couldn't god have been someone who has the ability to create and direct the world aound us without the ability to absolutely dictate present and the future?
Why shouldn't god have his own follies, likes and dislikes, strength and weakness?
By boxing god into omnipotent and omniscient we make him into someone who couldn't care less about the insignificant us.
However a god who is less than omnipotent and omniscient could still be powerful enough to pervade and influence our lives and could be one that craves for us to love him and worship him and is benevolent to his believers and either malevolent or indifferent to his non-believers.
Such a god could have created the universe and may be directing it without completely controlling it.
What would be the problem in accepting such a god?
2006-09-21
08:05:00
·
5 answers
·
asked by
Harry
3
in
Arts & Humanities
➔ Philosophy
My question is not about making up our own god but accepting god for what he is (could be). By ascribing omnipotence and omniscience to god we are actually worshipping a god as we want him to be than worshipping god as he is.
2006-09-22
04:02:49 ·
update #1
Surprised to see a Hindu point of view that states "God is not subject to speculation or philosophizing". Far from it, Hindu scriptures call for intense philosophizing, bordering on speculation, about the various nature of god(s). You need to re-read your scriptures again.
2006-09-22
04:13:45 ·
update #2
Mono-theism shouldn't preclude a less than omnipotent god. God just needs to be the being that most influence the events of the universe. He should have the vision to direct the universe (much like a Emperor of the universe). He need not be the most strong or most knowledgeable but one that has the most say in how things should be done and enough minions to carry out his wishes.
2006-09-22
04:21:41 ·
update #3