As if the liberal democrats didn't lead the parade in denigrating our country and President - along comes the new spokesman for the democrats-repeating their sentiments exactly-and then some . Hugo Chavez is running his own economy into the ground - and if he has his way-oil prices will skyrocket . This socialist is going to come to America and bum-rap our country ; then go pump up the labor unions here ? Who's ready for a socialist government ? If we didn't know before that liberal democrats are / and have been trying to bring us all into socialism and communism . It has never been more clear .
2006-09-21 07:36:37 · 13 answers · asked by missmayzie 7 in News & Events ➔ Current Events
The thought of Chavez and Ahmadinejad in the US is uncomfortable and embarassing, yet their presence represents the very ideas our country stands for. These two men would never allow US leaders to speak to the citizens of their country on a national level.
2006-09-21 07:51:26 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
I think you need to check a few facts first:
1) Democrats, in general, don't denegrate our country. They do denegrate our president and his actions. But disagreeing with the president is not disagreeing with America. Let me repeat, just so this is clear - President does not equal America. Neither does Republican = America.
2) Chavez has done more to help people afford gas than Bush. Last winter Chavez donated large amounts of natural gas to those Americans that couldn't afford it otherwise. On the other hand, Bush has done more to raise gas prices through his foreign policy than anyone else, not to mention all of the tax breaks, etc. he and his Republican controlled Congress have given to these companies that are making record profits.
3) Democrats are not pushing for a Socialist nation, that is the Socialist party (it does exist in America, they just don't usually make it on the ballots). Democrats simply believe that corporations shouldn't be able to exploit their workers and that all Americans deserve and equal chance. I just answered another question that explains this more clearly, feel free to take a look.
2006-09-21 07:44:39 · answer #2 · answered by John J 6 · 2⤊ 1⤋
No. inspite of the incontrovertible fact that we are able to blame Bush for giving him a bullypulpit of types by horribly mishandling family with him from the initiating. Bush further too lots interest to him. Chavez is a communist, and a dictator. And component to the international oil expenditures going up lays at his ft, as he voided old contracts and staged government take overs. And has eradicated a selection of of the loose press. And yet, he's hailed by many S. individuals for butting head with Bush. (purely are not getting it) we could have been extra constructive off if he were formally disregarded, and stored from the spotlight. As for the Demo. applicants, politicians campaigning for president like great business enterprise too lots to believe that.
2016-10-17 09:50:36 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Bush is bad, but a devil ... well, I guess Chavez is correct there! Bush has lied to the American people and caused more harm to the USA than any person in history. If we survive Iraq, it will be a miracle. With our army lost in the desert and now about worn out, we only have a nuclear option to deal with Iran. People are the strength of America or any nation. The political parties are dividing not uniting the people in an effort to bring this country down. You are part of the problem, not part of the solution.
2006-09-21 07:48:23 · answer #4 · answered by Pey 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
HaHaHa, that's was the funniest speech I have ever heard in a long time. Finally someone talking about a dictator-wanna-be who is brainwashing just the way Hitler did in the 1930's without the populace knowing that it was going on. Wake up!!! We need more than two big political parties, this is the only democratic country with only two parties. Why????
2006-09-21 08:01:10 · answer #5 · answered by At Last WC2010 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋
I don't know what is the situation Venezuela's economy. I do know that the economy of another "dictatorship", Belorussia, is doing pretty well. And I believe that had President Bullshit decided to be a normal peace loving head of state, Russia and Venezuela whould have supplied the US with oil for a special prize, and Bullshit wouldn't have had to lick the assholes of Saudi-Arabia's royal family. Remember: Most of the 9/11 attackers were Saudi nationals (not even one of them was Iraqi).
2006-09-21 08:11:43 · answer #6 · answered by Avner Eliyahu R 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Let's see here. The choices are Hugo Chavez or Howard Dean? Tough choices here my friends. Is it any wonder real Democrats are choking down their pride and contemplate having to vote for a (GAG!) Republican again.
2006-09-21 07:49:37 · answer #7 · answered by namsaev 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋
No he is too sane for them. Dean makes him sound like a Bush lover.
2006-09-21 07:59:05 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
Democrat, smimocrat. You are allowed to think for yourself.
2006-09-21 07:44:49 · answer #9 · answered by Special Ed 5 · 2⤊ 1⤋
no, even the democrats are p!ssed of with this guy
2006-09-21 20:29:43 · answer #10 · answered by acid tongue 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋