Nope! Come on, do you know this guy's history? He has like a zillion kids and has nothing to do with most of them. He got married the day after his estranged daughter was killed for gripes sake! And she was killed in a stolen car and apparently she was a drug user for years. Dog is no one to look up to, he is a pathetic excuse for a human being who should be taking care of his kids instead of primping for his stupid show with his stupid cow of a wife. Plus the old sh*t needs a serious haircut.
2006-09-21 10:15:34
·
answer #1
·
answered by BlueSea 7
·
0⤊
2⤋
even bounty hunters break the law, and must pay the cost of doing so. Just because they are Americans, doesn't mean they above the law nor have the right to break the laws of another country. They obviously have learned that lesson the hard way. Doesn't matter how much of a celebrity you are, it doesn't give you the right to kidnap someone from another country, without getting the pertinent authorities involved.
2006-09-21 07:42:05
·
answer #2
·
answered by judy_r8 6
·
1⤊
2⤋
I absolutely will. These are guys that are in service to rid the streets of the "real" criminals out there. To arrest them for doing their job is a joke. I realize that it is illegal in mexico, but that only protects the fugitives looking for safe harbor.
2006-09-21 08:39:10
·
answer #3
·
answered by Donnie J 1
·
2⤊
1⤋
In regards to Duane (Dog) Chapman’s extradition…
It is hypocritical of the U.S. government to agree with the extradition of Duane (Dog) Chapman.
If bounty hunting is indeed illegal in Mexico, then Duane did indeed commit an illegal act. However, the U.S. took custody of Andrew Luster (convicted for drugging and raping several women) when Duane brought him back across the border. THE U.S. GOVERNMENT TOOK THE” SPOILS” OF THE ILLEGAL ACTIVITY BECAUSE THEY KNEW IT WAS FOR THE BEST! (The FBI had federal agents searching for Luster themselves!) Andrew Luster was indeed captured by a process deemed illegal in Mexico, but the U.S. government had no problem accepting the result of the illegal activity. If Duane Chapman must be returned to Mexico, then Andrew Luster must also be freed, because his imprisonment WAS THE DIRECT RESULT OF ILLEGAL ACTIVITY! It’s ironic how quickly anxiously the U.S. government took Luster into custody yet they’re so slow to defend the very man who risked his life to bring the criminal to them! If the U.S. expects to uphold the punishment of such convicted criminals as Andrew Luster, then it must also uphold the protection of people who work to take said criminals off the street!
We’re reminded of President Bush’s remarks that dreadful day our country was attacked by terrorists.
“The search is under way for those who are behind these evil acts. I've directed the full resources for our intelligence and law enforcement communities to find those responsible and bring them to justice. We will make no distinction between the terrorists who committed these acts and those who harbor them.”
Mexico was harboring this convicted rapist!!!! Duane found him, and “brought [him] to justice.” Which is worst, a terrorist, or a rapist? I would argue a rapist. In many terrorist cases, the terrorists simply kill their victims. Rape victims often end up living the rest of their lives haunted by the tragic event.
It would be weak, un-Christian, and immoral for President Bush to lower his standard because on
What do I ask? I ask that political leaders of the U.S. and Mexico see past the politics that haunt this case, and accept the event as a triumph for those who work towards justice and freedom. Duane’s act of crossing the border into Mexico did not hurt anyone, didn’t injure anyone, and didn’t contradict the constitution of the country of which he is a citizen! It did put a rapist behind bars and it did send a message that citizens of the United States of America will stop at nothing to punish those who rape and kill innocent people. Mexico doesn’t need him in prison, that would do no more to rectify the situation than releasing Andrew Luster would! If the FBI could “work with Mexican officials” to extradite Luster back to the U.S., they can certainly work with those same officials to prevent Duane's extradition to Mexico.
AT WORST, alternative punishments for Duane could be discussed. These may include serving his time in U.S. prisons, probation, fines, and diplomatic negotiations involving economical or other incentives. Refusing to allow Duane to be handed over to Mexican officials would protect him from inhumane conditions in Mexican prisons, and send a clear message to Mexico that we will not tolerate harboring of convicted criminals.
It is ridiculous to expect a hero like Duane Chapman to be handed over to the Mexican prison system. Mexico owes the Duane Chapman and the United States an apology. The United States Government (namely the U.S. attorney’s office, the Head of the State Department, and President Bush himself) owes Duane Chapman an apology for not extinguishing this flame the moment it was sparked. Shame on the U.S. government for not immediately rushing all available resources to the judicial protection of Mr. Chapman. Resources of this wonderful country will now be wasted pursuing foreign incrimination of an American hero.
God bless Duane (Dog) Chapman, may he one day be treated with the respect he deserves and may his message of justice, truth, and family love be regarded as absolute truth in this politically tormented world we live in.
-Kevin
2006-09-23 18:38:25
·
answer #4
·
answered by guyinjackson 2
·
1⤊
0⤋
Absolutely yes.
2006-09-21 11:24:24
·
answer #5
·
answered by sunshine 6
·
2⤊
1⤋
He breaks the law to get those that break the law, and this isn't the first time he got caught. No offense, but NO.
2006-09-21 07:35:28
·
answer #6
·
answered by allyrbaserbelong2us 2
·
1⤊
2⤋
of course....i gotta support my father in law, husband, and brother in law
2006-09-21 09:35:54
·
answer #7
·
answered by soul.searcher 3
·
2⤊
0⤋
Yes!!!
2006-09-21 07:45:02
·
answer #8
·
answered by irish_swede1962 1
·
2⤊
1⤋
OK
2006-09-21 07:32:52
·
answer #9
·
answered by The Foosaaaah 7
·
2⤊
1⤋