We know where but the price is too high for one man when we can dismantle his organization as we take his operatives off the battlefield we already have.
2006-09-21 06:38:14 · 11 answers · asked by Tommy G. 5 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Nah, he's not that important. He only organized the murder of close to three thousand Americans because they went to work or were flying somewhere. But, hey, he deserves to live and be free. Hey! Why don't we give him a parade?
2006-09-21 06:43:41 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
I think he is very important, to show the world we mean what we say, we no he is in Pakistan in the mountains, but the tribes up their are for him and keep him safe, and worn him of any troops that are looking for him, even the Pakistani army is looking for him, the only way we can get him is to nuke the place, and no body want to do that. Yes we have hurt him and his operatives but not enough to stop what is going on, he is a good symbol and leader to get rid of, and will let other people no that take his place they will be next, that is all they understand is power.
2006-09-21 13:50:29 · answer #2 · answered by hexa 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
If the USA goes into Pakistan it will destabilize a country that is already on the brink of becoming a radical Islamic regime like Iran. The only difference being they already have nuclear weapons. So for now the option of containment is the best for the safety of the world.
2006-09-21 13:43:11 · answer #3 · answered by 3rd parties for REAL CHANGE 5 · 1⤊ 2⤋
Oh go on then,count me in. But I have to be back before Emmerdale Farm begins in 15 mins. Double episode tonight.
2006-09-21 13:45:24 · answer #4 · answered by Taylor29 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Bin Laden is just a symbol, what he represents, is the cowardice
of the Muslim jihadist, just as they , hide behind ,women, he hides in a cave
2006-09-21 13:58:01 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
How will the U.S. invade Pakistan? There is not enough military personnel to do that. They are already spread too thin in Iraq, remember what Bush says "we have to fight the terrorist there (Iraq), or we have to fight them here". So what are we gonna do?
2006-09-21 13:44:31 · answer #6 · answered by rab 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Best thing is do one thing at a time ,finish the one that is already in progress than look for the next.
2006-09-21 13:42:50 · answer #7 · answered by Dr.O 5 · 3⤊ 1⤋
What a load of bullshit. Bush can't afford to have his number one boogie man taken out.
2006-09-21 13:48:28 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
How could we know where he is?
I think George Bush has bad or no intelligence.
2006-09-21 13:46:12 · answer #9 · answered by imnogeniusbutt 4 · 2⤊ 1⤋
We need to anyway. They harbor tons of terrorists.
2006-09-21 13:41:29 · answer #10 · answered by El Pistolero Negra 5 · 3⤊ 0⤋