19 men took over passanger jets with 2-300 people on them armed with "box cutters" ....How is that possible ? Lets say the ratio was 20 hijackers to 200 passengers 10 to 1 ?
How is it that they know this when the black box was never found ? The pilot called it in and said "hi air traffic control we have been hijacked by a guy with a box cutter gotta go now? If this is the case why don't they realease that tape and wxactly at which point did airtraffic control know the plane was hijacked.
Since the majority of these people who took the plane over were from Saudi Arabia why did America go bombing Afganistan and then invade Iraq and is now threatening Iran .............shouldn't Saudi be on the top of the list not the bottom?
Why is it that the US hasn't found Bin Laden after 5 years when the President himself said "we have satilites that can tell if your shoes are tied from space". Really think the guy is over 6' on dialisis for kidney failure
2006-09-21 06:13:30 · 15 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
When one of the towers fell the military took up a position on the coast a few miles away - they did not enter the area until well after the third tower fell some time after wards ....WHY did they imediately take up a position and then not help the public after the first tower fell unless they knew more was coming ? Who ordered them to hold thier current position and why?
Why did Bush stay in the school so long after he was told America was under attack?
Why was there a dumping of stocks the week before and how is it that 100% of all Israeli nationals were absent that day and in fact had moved to another office a week previous well out of the way of the damage . Is that simply good luck or did they know somthing?
2006-09-21 06:17:51 · update #1
One of these guys apparently flew a small aircraft and had been trained in that by a flight school in the USA
That is a hell of a lot different that a massive comercial air plane - How did any of them fly this plane ? Who has been in the **** pit of one of these jets? It is massively complex and the guy in question had a hard time flying a small 2 seater?
Wow did this guy get good fast I wish I was as good a student in anything
How did a "joe blow" get to the point he could do such a thing ?
2006-09-21 06:23:05 · update #2
buzzy360c...
The response provided by this person is a good example of brain washing .
Notice he/she equates question and reason with anti Americanisim. He/she limits what can be asked and states wrongly that somehow I have hurt the families involved by investigating the event. This attitude easily leads to facist doctrines of obsessive nationalisim .....the act of questioning upsets the person to the point where there is no counter point made just overly emotional slurs in order avaoid obvious questions and reason. The statement is made with the intent of scaring me and others from making a reasonable investigation of the governemts story .....
Beware of this attitude that last time the public was lead down the path this person is on we found Jews gypsy's and other "undesirables" in concentration camps in Germany and Poland.
buzzy360c...Thank you for that excelent example of thought control and the proper attitude for alowing facisim
2006-09-21 06:31:13 · update #3
Optimist
You have a very good point there is nothing you or I can do about anything that has happened . Shakespeare's Ladyt MacBeth put it this way "thing without remedy should be given no regaurd" I don't mean it in quite the cold way she did but I think the message is important enough -
2006-09-21 07:15:25 · update #4
watch loose change 2 my friend.
2006-09-21 06:15:49 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 5⤋
1) 100% of israelis were not absent - a number of both Jews and Israelis died in the towers, proportional to the number that were (a) working in the towers at the time, and (b) living in the city at the time.
2) The people on the plane thought it was a hijacking - the people on flight 93 only crashed the plane when they realized that they were on a suicide mission. as victims of a hijacking, they figured that the plane would land and the commandos would come get them.
3) The US hasn't found bin ladin because they aren't looking for him. Somehow 80% of americans couldn't correctly say that NONE of the hijackers were from Iraq. The whole 9/11 conspiracy was so that the neocons could invade iraq - and the funny part is that it wasn't for cheap oil for americans, it was for control of the oilflow for american companies. Also for companies like KBR and Halliburton to make billions of dollars in contract fees.
4) The hijackers were saudi but i think that they were living and training in afganistan. also the us woul never invade saudi arabia - remember that they have invested 7-8% of the US GDP here. America has military bases there, and our corporations do huge businesses there. Bush Sr. and Bandar were huge pals. Nobody would ever **** off saudi arabia.
5) Bush stayed in the classroom because he wanted to see what happened to the goat. It was a very engrossing story and he needed to know how it ended. It's possible that he stayed becaue he's a freakin moron and was trying to think about what to do. Or it's possible because he realized that Cheny's conspiracy has finally borne fruit and the gravity of that was too much for him.
6) There was some shady **** happening with the air traffic controllers - i saw the documentary about it and they just didn't have the ability to do anything. Where were the F16's? What was the holdup? I don't know.... but I can guess.
7) Also, apparently the problem with finding osama is that he is now hiding out in pakistan, and apparently there is some holdup with the US sending bin ladin finders there. Yesterday "bush said he would if there was credible evidence" but people have been talking about "credible evidence" he was there for 2 years now. Maybe they didn't want to capture osama because then people would consider the 9/11 attack avenged and want to end the so-called war on terror... then again bush's approval rating has slipped so far away that even his own party is distancing themselves from him... so i don't think he minded fighting an unpopular war. Maybe he just didn't want to take out one of his own agents?
2006-09-21 06:31:33 · answer #2 · answered by gradient descent 2 · 2⤊ 0⤋
19 men took over passanger jets with 2-300 people on them armed with "box cutters" ....How is that possible ? (Airport security, who noticed the murderers before they got on the planes, were forbidden to investigate them because of "racial profiling" political correctness rules.)
Lets say the ratio was 20 hijackers to 200 passengers 10 to 1 ?
How is it that they know this when the black box was never found ? (You obviously didn't watch the 9/11 docudrama- you know, the one THE CLINTONS didn't want you to watch!)
The pilot called it in and said "hi air traffic control we have been hijacked by a guy with a box cutter gotta go now? If this is the case why don't they realease that tape and wxactly at which point did airtraffic control know the plane was hijacked.
Since the majority of these people who took the plane over were from Saudi Arabia why did America go bombing Afganistan (Taliban links to the hyjackers, centered in Afghanistan) and then invade Iraq (Supplying money and weapons to Taliban and Al Quaeda) and is now threatening Iran (Who is threatening the world with nuclear weapons) .............shouldn't Saudi be on the top of the list not the bottom?
(Saudi Arabia has been working somewhat to quell terrorist activity, but, shucks, they keep escaping from thier jails!)
Why is it that the US hasn't found Bin Laden (Uh, we did, FIVE times when Monica's surgar-daddy was in the White House, but he was too busy and just didn't have time to deal with it, so he bombed Serbia!) after 5 years when the President himself said "we have satilites that can tell if your shoes are tied from space".
(*Well, lets see, the NY Times and company keep telling him we are on his trail, and give him hints where we are looking and where he should go next, to put us off the trail. And, writing about how terrible we are for listening in to terrorists' phone calls so we can save the innocent lives of citizens everywhere!)
Really think the guy is over 6' on dialisis for kidney failure. (Maybe you should ask the doctors that give him medical supplies, and the electric company in Pakistan.)
2006-09-21 06:27:09 · answer #3 · answered by R.L. S 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Trout you really should break your questions up a bit more.
The people on the planes had no reason to think that they would be flown into buildings, it was unprecidented (meaning it had never happened before). When the people on flight 93 found out what was going on yeas they did do something. Unfortunately not everyone is a jacked up 25 ex-commando, a lot of people on those planes were grandparents, out-of-shape businesspeople, or otherwise unlikely to be a physical threat. Yes putting one armed air marshal on each flight solves the problem.
The black box probably ended up where everthying else did in the towers burned at a couple of thousand degrees then smashed into little tiny bits by a skyscrapper falling on them.
Yes the satelites can see everything, if they can be told where to look, if you doubt me try to find something on google earth, the world is a VERY big place.
Stock selloff had already begun because of the tech bubble bursting. Lots of people had already lost a lot of money and were getting out while they could, it was just coincidence.
Flying one is actually pretty simple, even you could probaly do it if you weren't concerned with landing, taking off or much more than rudimentary navigation (see those huge buildings saheeb, fly that way)
2006-09-21 06:20:26 · answer #4 · answered by medic 5 · 1⤊ 1⤋
The standard procedure for hijackings before 9-11 was to cooperate and everyone would make it home safe.
It only took an hour or so for the information to get to the people on Flight 93 that these people were not going to let them go home safely, and they took over the flight. They did fight back once they realized that it was their only chance.
Bin Laden? He's probably dead and buried somewhere in the desert.
We went into Iraq because they sponsored terrorists and trained them there.
Put down the Kool Aid and learn to think for yourself.
2006-09-21 06:16:00 · answer #5 · answered by Robby216 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Personally i think that was a zionism scenario which has been made , and that way israel's startegic enemies will be destroyed.
they just wanted a reason for that to invade afghanestan and iraq and maybe finally iran.
I am from iran and i worried about attacking u.s to us.
but if us or any country attacked to iran, then we will answer the fire. so maybe world war III is near to happen.
I hope that we will live in a world full of peace and justice, and world war III not to happen.
remember that, in the latest war between iran and iraq, we just aimed the military targets. we didnt attack to people, we didnt bombed the cities. thats why iraq people love iranian people, because they didnt feel the war and terror on their homes and their lives.
2006-09-21 06:36:14 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
you win - most ludicrous question of the day.
If you have to go to the "He's 6 foot tall, why can't they find him?" well....you're breaking new ground in silliness.
Ever heard of one guy holding a bank full of people hostage with a revolver? It happens frequently. Surely the patrons know that he only has 6 bullets. That's six bullets against, say, 30 people. The odds are 1 to 5! Why don't they just rush him. I mean, how many could he kill? Or are you suggesting that a razor-sharp box cutter couldn't kill someone...or endless people?
2006-09-21 06:21:14 · answer #7 · answered by jamie 4 · 2⤊ 0⤋
What I find absolutely pathetic, is that supposedly adults like Deuce.. above, retorts.. because you are a moron!. No attempt to answer your assertion. No attempt to say that the facts are wrong, just insults.
Who and When will these people that vehemently say that 9/11 was perpetrated by men who had tin cutters can give us some clear evidence of this fact we will stop asking questions like yours.
I have stopped and advised my children against watching channels like Nat. Goe. because of the patently biased and twisted rubbish they fed us over 9/11. If they are capable of such propaganda, what else will they do?
Please CONS, just one of you, answer this question without reverting to insults.
2006-09-21 06:25:19 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Hey stop arguing about 9/11 disaster there were innocent people being killed .No matter how it happened .It made us sad to see dying people in that ruined skyscraper.There were people jumping from windows through the air just to survive from fire .Think about that .No matter how it happened .It was a very bad disaster .There were innocent people in that building .What matter even this is a plan of America what changes .Does this difference give us the people back that died there .They left their families crying and sad .There were fathers , children , mother , and all type of people in that building .No matter how it happened .It made me sad .It shouldn't happen.
2006-09-21 06:48:57 · answer #9 · answered by xeibeg 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
it's possible because they were banking on complacency. we had been taught for 20 years that if your plane is hijacked, you follow instructions and wait to be rescued. you saw what happened to the plane where the passengers knew what was coming. it is why they won't be able to ever pull that again.
we recovered the boxes. it wasn't discovered that we did for a while which is creepy, but we have them...
http://www.counterpunch.org/lindorff12202005.html
we went to bomb afghanistan because that is where the taliban was. they claimed responsibility for the attacks immediately, so that's who was in our sights first.
the president is full of it when he says that if he did. i have no idea where bin laden is, but we don't seem to be looking very hard for him.
2006-09-21 06:16:39 · answer #10 · answered by uncle osbert 4 · 1⤊ 1⤋
You shi& on the families that lost loved ones on 9/11
You are one sick human please seek help before you hurt your self or others
Just how proud are you for spitting in the families faces?
Is being anti-America mean that much to you?
Do you ever get tired of hateing so much?
Are fact and reason beyond your comprehention abilities?
Two words for you ...***** Yew
2006-09-21 06:20:33 · answer #11 · answered by buzzy360comecme 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋