I WAS SERVED A PETITION FOR A RESRAING ORDER, TOOK 4 MONTHS TO SERVE ME BECAUSE I WASN'T EVEN IN TOWN. THIS WAS AN ACT OF REVENGE FROM AN EX. BOYFRIEND I HAD MORE THAN ENOUGH EVIDENCE TO PROVE THAT I WAS N'T STALKING THIS PERSON, AS IWASN'T EVEN IN TOWN. HAD PLANE RECEIPTS, RENTAL CAR CONTRACT FROM ANOTHER STATE, CERTIFIED STATEMENTS, PHONE LOGS, ETC. THIS PERSON HAD ON HIS PETITION HE WAS FOLLOWED BY ME THROUGH TOWN, COULDN'T GIVE A DESCRIPTION OF CAR, GAVE SPECIFIC DATES WHEN HIS VECHILE WAS DAMAGED, WHEN I WAS 1200 MILES AWAY, ETC. I HAD NO FEAR OF GOING TO COURT BECAUSE I KNEW I HAD DONE NOTHING WRONG AND HAD THE EVIDENCE TO PROVE THIS. ON THE DAY OF COURT I HAD ALL EVIDENCE WITH ME, HE HAD AN ATTORNEY. WHEN I ENTERED THE COURT ROOM, AND IT WAS MY TURN TO REBUTE, I WAS TOLD THAT MY EVIDENCE HAD TO TURNED IN TO THE BALIFF BEFORE I ENTERED THE COURT ROOM, I WAS NOT INFORMED. MY WITNESS TESTIFIED I WAS OUT OF STATE . THE JUDGE RULED THE I COULD HAVE MADE HARRASING CALLS FROM OHIO.
2006-09-21
05:28:17
·
3 answers
·
asked by
cgluster
1
in
Politics & Government
➔ Law & Ethics