What will be the consequences if we retreat from the War on Terror?

Question

So many people advocate a retreat, but do they consider the larger, longer term impact this action would have?

Does anybody think the world will magically become safer if we withdraw?

Does history support pushing toward victory or retreat as achieving a greater peace?

Answer 1

History has shown that whe you let the enemy live you only have to fight a different battle a different day. So many say this is an invisible enemy but it is not! There has to be a way to identify the enemy! That is why I support wiretapps, ect. I understand it is lose of a priverlage of privacy but that is better than dead. What real privacy do we have now? War is not meant to be easy, or simple. Sacrfices have to be made. What if our grandparents made peace with Hitler or Tojo? What world would we live in? I am sure we all have a good idea of the answer. No, you defeat your enemies to be free. The world has never respected those who compromised their values and beliefs for peace. It only bought time and a weaker position.

Answer 2

To really understand this, you have to seperate the real War on Terror from our War in Iraq. Though many would argue otherwise, the War in Iraq is undermining the War on Terror by turning global sentiment against us. The War on Terror is more than just our military conflicts in Afghanistan and Iraq, or our detention centers in Europe and Cuba. Rather, it is an ongoing battle to change the world's view of America from negative to positive. It is as much a physical war as a war of ideas. As such, the war will never really end. We may withdraw from conflicts before they are done, but the ideological war will likely drag on.

So, let's assume for a moment you're only talking about the physical war. We've learned from our past that withdrawing from a tough conflict can lead to greater instability or more instability. For an example of the former, look to our earlier involvement in support islamic militants in Afghanistan during the cold war. For an example of the latter, look to Vietnam. Though we withdrew, much to the chagrin of many citizens, the world balance didn't change. We saved American and Vietnamese lives and the world kept spinning. Withdrawing from Afghanistan would likely see the re-introduction of a strong Taliban; one which would probably fight until it was back in control of the majority of the country. This, in turn, would create another safe haven for al qaeda and it's copycats. Withdrawl from Iraq would likely have no effect on the country's current path to instability, though it might hasten it a tad. It certainly wouldn't cause it to reverse course as it heads for a civil war. However, an Iraqi population already weary of foreign insurgents would likely find ways to drive them out eventually.

Answer 3

hi. you're no longer likely to get sturdy solutions by limiting human beings like this. i could say nr a million yet something desires to get replaced! Did all people ever think of roughly why the "terrorists" carry terror at u . s . a . of america and the western international? What reasons human beings to blow themselves up, case in point? The western international desires to take a sturdy examine out it´s remote places coverage. Why carry out a little Muslims hate the western international? To me it extremely is staggering that those in potential interior the west look to have in no way concept approximately this. This enemy isn't unbeatable even though it desires to be fought with better than weapons!

Answer 4

The question is about a non-issue.

Advocation of a retreat from the "war on terror" is just a straw man agument set up by the republicans. Nobody is actually advocating it.

Answer 5

The Iraq war wasn't a part of the War on Terror, yet it is becoming moreso day by day. You should've retreated before it became a battlefield.

Answer 6

we are in too deep to pull out now. if we leave now another sadam will take over and history repeats itself. plus all the iraqis that are counting on us to help would grow to hate us. we already have a lot of people hating us already. bush is an idiot and we should have never been there in the begging. we should have gone after bin ladden with greater efforts.

Answer 7

But we cannot fight an invisible enemy forever and a day. We are losing the war. Do you feel safer than you did this time two years ago? I certainly don't!

Answer 8

War on terror need an original way.Terrorists are not armies.They can be defeated by intelligence spies i.e F.B.I.

Answer 9

Im all for the war on terror, just get us out of Iraq...

Answer 10

It's not about terror. It's secretly about THIS!...
http://www.strayreality.com/Lanis_Strayreality/iraq.htm