Can anyone explain why? People could always answer by saying no, couldn't they
2006-09-21 04:52:19 · 32 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Government
The violation system in place is a complete joke, and everyone knows it, click on any question or answers flag t report abuse, no matter what it says, and yahoo will remove it, with no explanation to the said violator, you have no redress at all, some of the things i have seen on here, make your blood boil, so how this question can be removed is beyond the pail. Good question friend, i am not going to answer it, as i'm English, and don't really understand your impeachment rules, free speech for all.
2006-09-21 06:53:36 · answer #1 · answered by amrhappy1 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I'm guessing somoene complaied that you were posting something against the Yahoo! Answers policy...don't know what that could be if all you asked was if Bush should be impeached. Before they delete a Q they (Yahoo) sends you an email with a reason.
But my answer to the question to if George W Bush be impeached is: consider the alternative. Would you want Cheney to be the Pres? Cheney is pure evil, Bush is semi-evil and semi-retarded.
2006-09-21 04:55:45 · answer #2 · answered by The First 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Many funny answers about freedom of speech etc, this is a private members forum, you have no right to freedom of speech when posting questions or answers. Don't like it post, somewhere else.
The most likely reason is that either:
Your question was flawed in spelling or grammar (less likely as your Q above is ok).
Your question had been asked many times before and had been answered and closed successfully. Use Search to find out.
Your question lacked information, impeached for what?
Other users have said that racist and hate questions are common here and don't get removed, > most < of the ones i have reported have been removed.
2006-09-21 05:13:59 · answer #3 · answered by The Pirate Captain 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Understandably so. Bush's actions were not his own to take, they were demanded by the American people 'to do something'. If after 9-11 he hadn't done anything...the public would have demanded his impeachment...and so he did what people wanted...so now he is a monster. But to imply that he violated the laws of the land seems excessive. You may not like him but someone has to be boss. I do not support him or his policies but You need to understand the basic idea of presidency and that is leadership...right or wrong.
2006-09-21 05:01:32 · answer #4 · answered by Frank 6 · 3⤊ 0⤋
If he is convicted of a crime then your question would probably be acceptable. I dont know why Yahoo removed it in the first place though. Before impeachment is even a option you should be asking "should the president be convicted of a crime?" Lets get to the conviction before we get to the impeachment.
2006-09-21 04:56:27 · answer #5 · answered by jamie s 3 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Because George Bush has every reason to be impeached. If enough people are made aware of the reality and took action he would be in serious trouble - Obviously Yahoo have a political motive.
2006-09-21 05:00:21 · answer #6 · answered by Bring back Democracy 3 · 0⤊ 3⤋
funny. I have asked similar questions and had the same result. it seems that instead of coming up with an answer some ppl just click on the violation button.
2006-09-21 05:01:35 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
The reason it was removed was because it borders on "yelling fire in a crowded theater". I do not know how your question was worded but probably in an inflammatory way. Yes, they COULD all answer no. All COULD answer yes. Did you expect either scenario? I am skeptical that your question was as innocent as you would have us believe.
2006-09-21 05:37:51 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
You really offended someone. Questions get removed for the silliest reasons. Although I am a conservative you have the right to ask your question as anyone else does.
2006-09-21 04:57:19 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
The policy here is that anything any old creature is offended by gets removed.
They don't care in the slightest whether there is a reason for the complaint or not.
And yes, babybush should be accused of war crimes and removed from office.
2006-09-21 05:39:18 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 3⤋