Given he's been one of the best Presidents of all time, next to Reagan and the like, I often find myself wondering why we can't vote for him for a third term. If there were no term limits on President would you vote for George W. Bush for a third time around?
2006-09-21 04:27:36 · 33 answers · asked by midwestbruin 3 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
No no no !
2006-09-21 04:28:50 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 5⤋
No. the place has his "super compassion" been on a similar time as 3000+ troops have died in a pointless conflict began on lies and defective intelligence? Why did he enable the Bin weighted down relatives go away the U.S. after 9/11? He says he desires to combat terrorism , yet he grew to become into keen handy over our ports to a Dubai based business enterprise, what greater effective thank you to enable terrorists in to our united states of america? while bill Clinton left there grew to become right into a surplus of $235 billion. because of the fact George Bush Jr. took workplace, the excess has been depleted and his administration funds reflects over a $4 hundred billion federal deficit. He has led to the U. S. to lose the honour and allies it as quickly as had. finally, he's in simple terms undeniable stupid.
2016-10-15 06:25:20 · answer #2 · answered by mathison 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Why do you think G.W. is a good president? What has he done that would qualify him as one of the greats or even in the same league as Regan? Regan had Reganomics...that's what he's known for...whether you think it was a good policy or not....it still goes down in the history books as something good that was done durning his time.....and don't forget about the 1st lady she did a lot to help under priveldged children receive the education they deserve.
So seriously...what has the Bush administration done besides raise taxes for a war no one wants. I understand that we are over there to better our economy supposively, but it's been 4 yrs and I haven't seen a lot of improvement. What I have seen is Homeland Securities acting more along the lines of Big Brother from George Orwells 1984 than really preventing any terrorist attacks. Anyway if Homeland Security is so darn great...why aren't they doing anything about the boarder jumping on the Mexican boarder. Hell if terrorist wanted access to this country all they would have to do is disguise themselves as Mexican's.
Sooooooo.....tell me again why GW is the best president to every reign?
2006-09-21 04:39:21 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 3⤋
Thank god for term limits for presidents Bush it perfect example of term limits. Four more years of Bush our country will become a Theocracy will be at war with not only Iraq but Iran.
If you think price of gas was high in 2006 wait till Bush has third term. More tax cuts for the rich and more limits on our personal freedoms.
No thanks for third term did not vote him in 2000 or 2004.
2006-09-21 04:46:36 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
George W. would love this third term deal. He has stated that being a dictator is better as long as he is the dictator. I for one would contribute money to help send him to Saudi Arabia if we could gurantee his never returning to the United States. For company he could take his brothers Jeb and Neil with him. No third term for this moron. He has done enough damage.
2006-09-21 05:05:37 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
he did so poorly the first time i didn't vote for him the second - much less a third! but Clinton may be another story...
I am over 60, voted in every election since 18 and cast my first vote for a democrat in 2004!
2006-09-21 05:06:49 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
I would if I could vote! I know my parents would! He's been a great president no matter what any one says! There's only one thing he did the whole time that I didn't like! Go President Bush!!!
:D
2006-09-21 04:44:15 · answer #7 · answered by Lacking Daisies 3 · 3⤊ 3⤋
That would depend on the conservative running against him. I would vote for Bush before I could even consider the possibility of voting for any one the Dems could nominate in this day of age.
2006-09-21 04:42:16 · answer #8 · answered by battle-ax 6 · 4⤊ 2⤋
Hell-to-the-NO!
I'd just as soon vote in the retarded kid next door... wait, W. is a dumbass. He's brain-dead and is only in the war for the money. He's the cause behind 9/11; he funded it asked how it could be done. He's not smart enough to plan something like that.
I vote that he's shot and killed.
2006-09-21 04:41:24 · answer #9 · answered by l_marie_allen 3 · 0⤊ 3⤋
YES.What ever be his failings I give him full marks for his firm action against the menace of terrorism which is a dangerous plague if unchecked will multiply in geometric proportions and will overwhelm the civilized world. All the great intellectuals of today who indulge in criticizing Bush day in and day out will rue the days they criticized Bush if they survive to see the aftermath of terrorist plague.
2006-09-21 04:37:12 · answer #10 · answered by openpsychy 6 · 4⤊ 2⤋
If it was a choice between being flayed alive with a dull knife and dipped in rubbing alcohol or voting for Dubya, I would have to ponder it for awhile.
2006-09-21 04:46:24 · answer #11 · answered by LatexSolarBeef 4 · 0⤊ 2⤋