It IS the American Presidency that's involved, you know--so, let's consider his replacement by a BAG of marshmallows.
Would we lose anything?
Would we GAIN anything?
Would it make any difference?
2006-09-21 03:50:26 · 19 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Government
Bleeding Heart Liberal????!!!???? WHERE?? WHO?? Man, I voted for the idiot TWICE !!! As far as convervative politics is concerned, I am one of the ORIGINAL true believers--a GOLDWATER Republican. Better, a CLAYTON Republican. THAT predates even Goldwater !!!
2006-09-21 07:24:52 · update #1
I think that a bar of chocolate could do much better. Not only would it not say anything stupid, most of the world would love him/her/it. I mean really who doesn't love/like chocolate. (I think it would get the majority of the womens vote)
2006-09-21 04:00:51 · answer #1 · answered by piratewhench 2 · 3⤊ 1⤋
Well lets start with question #1- Hell no we wouldn't lose a damn thing! #2 - I think we would. We've had so much taken away from the American people. Although it might get worst, I believe if people stay on a positive note instead of sulking all the time and waiting for the bomb to drop, maybe this planet which of course includes America could pull it together working better with all countries throughout the world. But would this ever happen? Who the hell knows! And #3 - To me it doesn't look like mankind can f*ck it up any worse then what it is. The only thing that could be worse is Armageddon!
2006-09-21 04:01:36 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
It's an insult to marshmallows all over the world. Shame on you for wanting to put them in harms way! To have the gall to compare a marshmallow to GB, what will you think of next. Marshmallows are kind and gentle, they are smart and would not unnecessarily risk thousands of lives abroad. Cheers to marshmallows, the most intelligent inanimate object on the planet. Hooray!
2006-09-21 04:06:13 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
I dont even think we need a Bag of Marshmallows , 1 will do just fine , an probably do a better job than Bush is doing !
2006-09-21 03:58:20 · answer #4 · answered by lilredhead 6 · 2⤊ 1⤋
i did no longer be attentive to Diane Feinstein and Barbara Boxer went with him. rattling, they went back to work out their components? How are they gonna proceed saying Bush destroyed hearth hydrants in Malibu in the event that they are interior the air? And are they gonna take Pelosi's audio equipment jet there? I hear Pete Stark is bringin a bag of weiners tho.
2016-10-17 09:34:04 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
It would be a great improvement. At least the marshmallow would not create so much ill will in the world and erode the rights of its citizens.
2006-09-21 04:19:14 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
Oh yes...i would feel so comforted because a bag of Marshmellows can protect terrorists from hurting my friends & family.
How about we replace you with a bag fingernails?
2006-09-22 10:03:20 · answer #7 · answered by k-mac 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Not a bag . A marshmallow. And it WOULD make a difference... he wouldn't say stupid things anymore.
2006-09-21 03:53:12 · answer #8 · answered by Milos K 4 · 2⤊ 1⤋
At least the marshmallow wouldnt invade another country for no reason.
2006-09-21 04:00:48 · answer #9 · answered by Kutekymmee 6 · 2⤊ 1⤋
That would be fine. Then everyone will just tell the Marshmallow what to say.
2006-09-21 03:57:56 · answer #10 · answered by Fleur de Lis 7 · 2⤊ 1⤋