Bush is saying that he would send our troops into Pakistan without perrmission, if we knew "where" Bin Laden was hiding there. Don't you think it's about time....He should have gone after Bin Laden 5 yrs, ago instead of Saddam...any comments???
2006-09-21 03:25:44 · 7 answers · asked by ? 5 in News & Events ➔ Current Events
i think the president of pakistan should have already have taken him into custody or killed bin laden. for us to have to do other countries' work is out of the question. our men and women are dieing. because other countries are not fullfilling the promises they pledged.i see nothing wrong with us helping other countries as far as humanitarian needs but i think their armies shoud do the jobs they were put in place to do instead of having us to do all the dirty work for them.Pakistan knows where bin laden is they just don't want to deal with him. that's my opinion.
2006-09-21 04:16:06 · answer #1 · answered by morningstar6707 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think this would be wrong. We have already invaded 2 Arab Muslim nations and are still engaged there. Pakistan has been our ally in the fight against terrorism and to do something like this will only get us into another war. We were led into the war on Iraq under false pretenses and now we are stuck there cause if we leave the country will collapse in a civil war. There will be someone worse in power than Saddam and we will be in worse shape than ever. The new dictator may decide to go ahead and begin building a bomb and he will get away with it cause we cried wolf this time and the next time they wont believe us. We are engaged in a war not only in these countries but in our own as well, against unknown forces and to invade another country will only cause more problems. If you look at history, whenever a country gets too ambitious invading other countries this always leads to their downfall. Rome, Napoleon in France, England, Egypt, all of these countries engaged in one war after another to become leader of the entire world and they all fell. Their citizens began to tire of war, the countries raised taxes to pay for more weapons, the commanders began to make mistakes because of their over confidence, they under estimated the enemy and the resistance. Does any of this sound familiar? We are doing exactly the same things and these will prove to be our downfall.
2006-09-21 04:11:50 · answer #2 · answered by brendagho 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Now Pakistan secretly accepted arrival of American troops . Pakistan`s military General and president, Pervez Musharraf is facing a mutiny threat fron Army, rebellion from Clergy, and blackmail from Al Qieda. Only American troops have to protect Musharraf from death.
2006-09-21 03:48:16 · answer #3 · answered by J.SWAMY I ఇ జ స్వామి 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think you should stop messing up other people's countries.
Besides Pakistan is part of the British Commonwealth, so if you attack them, you attack a large proportion of the world.
2006-09-21 03:59:36 · answer #4 · answered by The Gadfly 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I'm all in favor of kicking as* when we need to. Covertly, maybe, but not a blatant march into Pakistani territory without their permission. Bush is a fool. I'm sure he means well, but you know what they say about the path to Hell.
2006-09-21 03:34:46 · answer #5 · answered by freeetibet 4 · 0⤊ 2⤋
only if bush would join them other wise they need to come home
enough killing of are americians
2006-09-21 04:00:26 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think we should bring our men and women home and quit killing them.
2006-09-21 03:33:12 · answer #7 · answered by couchP56 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋