Why point a finger at liberals--we are all the same. Liberals and republicans can both get wrapped up in emotion and start blaring ridiculous things--that aren't even true. It's called passion.
2006-09-21 03:25:54
·
answer #1
·
answered by .vato. 6
·
2⤊
3⤋
Next Attack Imminent: Muslims Ordered to Leave the US
Terrorism Hamid Mir, Dr. Paul L. Williams & David Dastych
September 19, 2006
Recently, Abu Dawood, one of the newly appointed commanders of the al
Qaeda forces in Afghanistan issued some disturbing statements. Dawood
stated: that final preparations have been made for the American
Hiroshima, a major attack on the US; said that Muslims living in the United
States should leave the country without further warning; indicated that the
attack will be commandeered by Adnan el Shukrijumah ("Jaffer Tayyer" or
"Jafer the Pilot"), a naturalized American citizen, who was raised in
Brooklyn and educated in southern Florida; that the al Qaeda operatives
who will launch this attack are awaiting final orders, that they remain
in place in cities throughout the country and that many are
masquerading as Christians and have adopted Christian names; that al Qaeda and the
Taliban will also launch a major strike (known as the ?Badar
Operation") against the coalition forces in Afghanistan during the holy month of
Ramadan; and that the American people probably will be treated to a
final audio message from Osama bin Laden which will be aired some time
later.
2006-09-21 03:29:29
·
answer #2
·
answered by El Pistolero Negra 5
·
0⤊
1⤋
My purpose is often civil discourse. yet whilst posed a spurious, poisonous, and albeit idiotic "question" inclusive of: "Why do democrats hate u . s . a . of america?" or "Do libs moist their pants whilst they see Bin weighted down?" or, my own widespread, "The surge is working. Why do libs hate freedom?" those are questions asked by 3 varieties of folk: Trolls those incapable of rational questioning Imbeciles with desktops in spite of everything, the questions are in no way queries designed to bring about a debate. they are heavy exceeded indictments. The winning answer is maximum probably the single that maximum is of a similar opinion with the poster, no longer the wonderful answer. interior the precis it extremely is all a great waste of time. yet whilst somebody starts up, I havev no difficulty flinging the bull**** impressive back at them.
2016-10-17 09:31:13
·
answer #3
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Because you need to have core values and logic in order to debate something. If you rule your life with your emotions, it's impossible to argue your point with someone.
"Because that's how I feel," is not good debating strategy.
They live their lives based on their emotions, and that's why they have to turn to insults, lies, exaggerations, and school yard taunts. It's all that's left after you've lost the debate.
2006-09-21 03:25:58
·
answer #4
·
answered by FozzieBear 7
·
3⤊
2⤋
Because their replies are based on what they believe to be "fair," ignoring the fact that life isn't fair and no one ever said it would be. Naturally, 'fair' to one person is 'unfair' to another.
As you pointed out, their answers don't hold water as they answer emotionally rather than logically.
Hysterical that the first answer - Jim W - was a liberal insulting you!!!
2006-09-21 03:29:06
·
answer #5
·
answered by dlil 4
·
2⤊
2⤋
Liberals rule by "feelings" if it dosen't make them feel good then it can't be right. They have replaced sense and thought with feeling. Once this is undone the Democrat party might have a chance.
2006-09-21 03:34:26
·
answer #6
·
answered by Bill 3
·
4⤊
1⤋
I agree with you. Most of the time I can't get a straight answer out of the liberals I talk to. "Why do you think we should impeach Bush?" "Well, I just don't like him!" Even in some of the answers to your question you got, "Why do YOU?" Finger pointing. The dem platform right now is: stop the GOP agenda. That's it.
2006-09-21 03:28:47
·
answer #7
·
answered by ? 2
·
4⤊
2⤋
Because debate is reliant on logic, knowledge and reason.
Most Liberals run on sheer emotion.
Thank you.
2006-09-21 03:58:55
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
1⤋
The term "debate" has (unfortunately, in my opinion) been denigrated to a negative.
Same with the word "argue," which used to connote reasoning together, now connotes hate.
Remember Shakespeare's "kill all the lawyers..."? The rest of the sentence is "AND WE WILL HAVE ANARCHY."
Have a nice day.
2006-09-21 03:28:54
·
answer #9
·
answered by ? 7
·
0⤊
3⤋
Because commie libs don't have the mental ability to debate, all they do is bash and insult when they don't have an arguement. Libs are mental midgets!
2006-09-21 03:30:34
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
3⤋