In order for ~ to be an equivalence relation, it must satisfy the three properties reflexivity, symmetry, and transitivity. In this case, checking these properties is not so difficult.
Obviously, (x1,y1) = (x1,y1) (reflexivity)
(x1,y1)=(x2,y2) and (x2,y2)=(x1,y1) (symmetry)
and if (x1,y1)=(x2,y2) and (x2,y2)=(x3,y3) , then (x1,y1)=(x3,y3) (transitivity)
note to person above: the relation was defined on R^2 :)
2006-09-21 09:53:15
·
answer #1
·
answered by Math_Guru 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
may be incorrect, yet the following is going with equivalence instructions u opt to satisy the three situations, reflesivity it truly is aparent becuase it on addition symetric n +p = m+q transivity then some xRy, yRz then xRz so (m,n) R (p,q) and (p,q) R (a,b) so this suggests, that (m,n) R(a,b) which so m+q = n+p and p+a = q+r so that you decide on to exhibit that m+a = n+b
2016-11-23 12:49:54
·
answer #2
·
answered by wanamaker 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
it is an equivalence relation
x1=x1
x1=x2 then x2=x1
x1=x2 x2=x3 then x1=x3
2006-09-21 02:31:30
·
answer #3
·
answered by CHIMPU 2
·
0⤊
1⤋
Reflexive: (x1,y1)~(x1,y1)
Symmetric: (x2,y2)~(x1,y1)
Transitive: (x1,y1)~(x2,y2) and (x2,y2)~(x3,y3)
then clearly, (x1,y2)~(x3,y3)
2006-09-21 02:30:53
·
answer #4
·
answered by bruinfan 7
·
1⤊
0⤋