2006-09-20 22:43:42 · 8 answers · asked by Theo 1 in Social Science ➔ Other - Social Science
science
2006-09-20 22:46:08 · answer #1 · answered by peter gunn 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
any systematic study can be a science and depending on the perception of the one who studies it, it can be an art also. that which appeals to the head i call science and that which appeals to the heart is art. hence archeology can be both science and art!
2006-09-20 22:54:19 · answer #2 · answered by whatsinaname 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Logy means study. And acrhe means ancient. so archeology means study of old. so archeology is definitely a science.
2006-09-20 22:55:29 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
It is based on science, but I don't know if I'd go as far as saying it is science. I don't see any reason to believe it is an art.
2006-09-20 22:53:53 · answer #4 · answered by Alucard 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
If history is BUNK then Archeology is JUNK.
It depends it has gone "high tech" and it does use scientific principles. But it does take skill and talent to put those clay jars back together!
2006-09-20 22:52:50 · answer #5 · answered by N3WJL 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
it relies upon on how the college teaches it. for some faculties, an MS ability you're taking extra technological know-how classes, it is the way i could bypass. yet in different faculties, an MA ability you're taking extra effective Arts classes. It feels like a similar component, would not it? it extremely isn't any longer.
2016-10-17 09:21:34 · answer #6 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Art is a science, science is an art, its all how u look at it and how passionate you are!
2006-09-20 23:00:34 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
It's both!
2006-09-20 22:51:48 · answer #8 · answered by cocoafellapb 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋