It seems that America will not take responsibility for it actions, mainly (in my opinion) becuase it sees climate change as a threat to its economics. Does policy on climate change mirror that of the communist threat during the cold war. The same emotions of paranoia and sheer anger seem to be evoked when this issue is raised.
2006-09-20 21:59:48 · 5 answers · asked by andham2000 3 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
While the Communits might have been overdoing America's role and paintint it blacker than it really is or rather was if you peruse the communits literature with an open mind there was no doubt that America was amiss in many respects. It dod realise but behaved like an obstinate bull which refuses to move.With the fall of the Soviet Union and being a monarch of all it surveyed and nobody finding fault with it with the vehemence Communits were doing America must be rather feeling out of sorts. The blame that is put at its door for environmental pollution it must have come into its own in the shadow fighting. The argument is puts forth are really strange. With the climatic changes increasing day by day the total denial thereof is not without dangerf to USA as well. But old habits die hard. As if environmental issues were not adequate it has raised the bogey of internatiopnal terrorism and engaged in boxing again. USA has almost become paranoid in this respect.
2006-09-20 23:46:23 · answer #1 · answered by Prabhakar G 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
you maintain shifting the bar. First it replaced into 'warming' then it replaced into 'replace'. Now you have eradicated the "human-led to" section from the lingo. FYI earth's climate is in no way secure-state, it extremely is consistently changing. The final ice age continues to be melting off. The sunlight has lots to do with the incontrovertible fact that each and every PLANET in this image voltaic equipment replaced into warming on a similar time earth replaced into. Then the sunlight went quiet and for 10 years there wasn't any 'warming', purely 'replace'. the genuine difficulty of course is the "guy-made" section. which you are able to not teach or maybe teach sturdy data for. in fact of course this entire component is purely extra "the reds went eco-friendly" simply by fact what extra constructive thank you to attack capitalism and u . s . a . of america than to declare automobiles, marketplace, electric powered production, and so on, are destroying the earth. I observe the environmentalists in no way point out how lots of a polluter China is. Oh, that jogs my memory, did Russia ever do something approximately all those Soviet nuclear reactors from submarines they only dumped interior the sea off Finland? No, they are nevertheless there. Why do no longer you carry out somewhat extra analyze extremely of complaining some television channel.
2016-10-17 09:20:31 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
After some (long?) time the US will begin to realize that the climate change itself, with its hurricanes, floodings, etc. is at least as big a threat to its economics.
2006-09-20 22:06:28 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 0⤋
Partially...
I can see the similarities due to both being related to economics. Although, I don't see any comparison when it comes to other aspects.
The anti-communism propaganda designed to spread fear to the masses of the 50s was different than what you see now with global warming. That fear involved making ppl fear for their lives.
The propaganda used to manipulate ppl against global warming involves prejudices.... and making ppl fear that their WAY OF LIFE is in jeopardy not their actual life.
See?
2006-09-20 22:08:48 · answer #4 · answered by BeachBum 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Yes, once again America is all alone fighting the notion of Global Warming. It must be an elaborate plot to hurt the american economy!
2006-09-20 22:02:59 · answer #5 · answered by dane 4 · 3⤊ 1⤋