English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

I'm familiar with the collapse theory and the universe slowly speeding away from us.

2006-09-20 19:55:04 · 2 answers · asked by kriend 7 in Science & Mathematics Physics

2 answers

Interesting thought, but how does that explain the data supporting the expanding universe theory? With your postulate wouldn't we expect to see portions of the universe expanding (away from black holes spewing stuff into our universe) while it would be contracting towards black holes doing the opposite?

Also, if it is true that matter/anti-matter are in balance then if your holes are just moving anti-matter wouldn't we risk have local areas where that balance is off-kilter? Why couldn't your holes recirculate matter right along with anti-matter?

Finally, this takes all the fun out of the Big Bang theory (which I personally find to problematic to accept), but if the universe is not expanding, it's tough to conceive of a Big Bang that expanded to a certain size and stopped and recirculated itself for eternity.

Still, though, it's worth a thought.

2006-09-20 20:06:29 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Not much. We have no idea how to get anything out of a black hole.

2006-09-21 03:02:03 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers