A foremost scholar on Islam talks about Caliph Ahmadinejad of Iran. http://www.opinionjournal.com/extra/?id=110008768.
This is an apocalyptic radical with similar views of running the world as Hitler's mein kampf. Don't believe me? Want to see what Ahmadinejad believes?
http://www.geocities.com/rahbarimam/14/12_imam.htm.
Liberals still want to compare Bush to Hitler?
2006-09-20 17:13:53 · 15 answers · asked by ? 7 in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
You either messed up or are deliberately misleading people with your first link which has nothing to do with Bush or Ahmadinejad but is an opinion piece about complaints and attempts by Democrats to have the movie written by the screenplay writer CYRUS NOWRASTEH who wrote "The Path To 911. altered or removed.
And Cyrus Nowrasteh is a screenplay writer not "a foremost scholar on Islam."
And your second link doesn't work.
And I would rather have Bush.
Its no secret Iran is jockeying for position to lead an Islamic Caliphate. With Ahmadinejad as the first Caliph.
2006-09-20 17:21:21 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 1⤋
Fortunately, I will never have to make that choice.
And all the crap about the Caliphate is nonsense. The Shia will never be ruled by the Sunni and vice versa. Persians will not be ruled by Arabs and vice versa. Turkey will not be ruled by either. Not to mention the Indonesians, all 150 million of them. Every empire has it's day and the days of any kind of a Muslim Empire are long gone and will not return. Any attempt at dominance would end up with them killing each other just like in Iraq. And the idea that they would invade the US or Europe is absurd. Just because Ahmadinejad spouts this crap doesn't mean he has a prayer of carrying it out.
PS the statement in the link that Bush got no special treatment in "Path to 9/11" is bull. They gave him a free pass for the first 8 months of his administration, where at best they were indifferent to the threat of terror, as well as for his behavior on that day, and everything he has screwed up since then.
2006-09-21 01:11:24 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
Yes. All liberals think Bush is exactly like Hitler. And anyone who questions the way the war in Iraq is being waged is secretly on the side of the terrorists. And if you don't want religion taught in public schools you must be an atheist. And if you think that we shouldn't dwell for oil in the Artic Refuge you must be a barefoot, tree hugging environmentalist.
I'm not sure what your question is supposed to mean. Are we supposed to believe that the only two possible choices are Bush and a guy who doesn't even have American citizenship? And what are we exactly deciding? Who should be president? Who should we go to for advice on buying shoes?
Can the answer to your question not be neither of these jerks?
2006-09-21 00:26:15 · answer #3 · answered by meridocbrandybuck 4 · 2⤊ 2⤋
Bravo to all of you libs that actually answered Bush! Maybe you are intellectually honest after all! Anyone who answered Ahmadinejad is lying! Or they seriously need to move out of our country. If you were to ask the question using Hillary in place of Bush, I, a strong conservative, would say (gulp) Hillary! I'm telling you Ahmadinejad is out to rule the world, after it is washed in the blood of the infidels (us) and await their great prophet who will return to Earth and bring peace and tranquilty. Among all of the people....the Muslim people, because there will be no others left alive.
2006-09-21 00:33:27 · answer #4 · answered by Cinner 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
I would rather have neither. They are both a serious threat to world peace and hold extremist views on a number of subjects especially religion.
They share the same apocalyptic belief that the end of the world is near.
Ahmadinejad believes that a final battle will end in all good muslims going straight to paradise.
Bush holds the fundementalist belief that when all the jews have returned to Israel there will be a final battle of Armageddon and righteous christians like him will be saved from harm in the rapture and taken straight to heaven
Meanwhile both men will leave the rest of mankind to suffer the results of their actions
2006-09-21 00:30:45 · answer #5 · answered by brainstorm 7 · 2⤊ 2⤋
Bush, or I would have moved to Iran a while ago. Please don't think that I like Bush in any way.
But when I have a choice between getting hit with a rock or crushed by a boulder, I will always pick getting hit with a rock.
Both are comparable to Hitler, but in different ways.
2006-09-21 00:21:40 · answer #6 · answered by C J 4 · 1⤊ 2⤋
You're asking us to choose the lesser of two evils. Of course I would pick Bush, but only in this example.
2006-09-21 00:23:27 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
Liberals would not tolerate his religious impositions and the destruction of the Bill of Rights he would bring.
2006-09-21 00:19:53 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
Why would we make a choice between those 2? What kind of crack brained logic is that?
2006-09-21 00:16:48 · answer #9 · answered by notyou311 7 · 1⤊ 3⤋
I'd rather be American than Iranian.
2006-09-21 00:37:03 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋