Question says it all, in my opinion, oh yah he would be.
2006-09-20 16:55:25 · 17 answers · asked by sp23 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Government
Chavez would be better hanging on the end of a rope by his neck
2006-09-20 17:14:24 · answer #1 · answered by rallman@sbcglobal.net 5 · 1⤊ 2⤋
First off, the squirrel running around in my front yard would make a better president than GWB.
Second of all, in response to the idiot mentioning Hitler, that person is incredibly misinformed and obscenely ignorant. Hitler was a right-wing fundamentalist Christian, just like Bush. Conservatives that are unable to think for themselves and only follow the Republican talking points like to say that Hitler was a socialist. Hitler claimed to be a socialist, but his government was fascist and corporatist...both right-wing ideals. Socialism involves universal health care, free education, a strong welfare system, etc, none of which were true under the Hitler regime. They were true before Hitler, but not true under him.
2006-09-21 00:57:08 · answer #2 · answered by corwynwulfhund 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
You are retarded. Chavez is a madman. Turn on the news tonight and see what he said on the floor of the United Nationsn today. He needs to be in an asylum with all the other loons.
2006-09-21 00:22:37 · answer #3 · answered by writer's block 4 · 2⤊ 1⤋
He is certainly a better public speaker and knows how to play the media. Same for the Socialist leader Adolf Hitler...
Never forget - Chavez adheres to a Marxist ideology that is hostile to America's principles, especially the Bill of Rights. No way he could take the Oath of Office and mean it.
Chavez is currently building and arming his 'KGB' loyalist fighting force and is following the usual path of Leftist tyrants.
2006-09-20 23:56:29 · answer #4 · answered by speakeasy 6 · 6⤊ 2⤋
Chavez made the sign of the cross ... I thought Bush was the Christian. Huh.
2006-09-20 23:59:25 · answer #5 · answered by pickle head 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Tickle Me Elmo might be a better President than W.
2006-09-21 00:03:48 · answer #6 · answered by nu_shashita 3 · 2⤊ 1⤋
No our gas would be 79 cents a gal and the poor people would be fed by oil money and not taxes from us. Wouldn't that suck? Can`t make any profits that way.
2006-09-20 23:58:28 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
Fox News sucks... and if it was not for the conservative propaganda, most people would realize you are correct.
But that is not what corporate america wants.
2006-09-21 01:09:26 · answer #8 · answered by da_d0dgers 2 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Feel free to write in his name during the next election. That'll show 'em!
2006-09-21 00:13:49 · answer #9 · answered by L3-knightw1zard 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
No, but gas costs 12 cents a gallon in venezuela, that might help sway me a little bit.
2006-09-20 23:57:22 · answer #10 · answered by big-brother 3 · 1⤊ 2⤋