English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

16 answers

It makes them feel special when they blame others for their mistakes and screw ups....I have never met a democrat that was able too make an honest decision with out first consulting the polls!

2006-09-20 17:02:46 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2 1

Democrats make decisions based on the people and for the people, who cares what other countries are doing to each other. We should focus on our own people and issues, that have been ignored ever since Bush took over.

2006-09-20 23:52:31 · answer #2 · answered by twelfntwelf3 4 · 2 3

why do conservatives blame liberals for everything wrong in the world, especially in a Republican controlled government where the Liberals are powerless? why does this ruling party not include the minority party and treat them with respect? Are you really afraid of a democracy?

2006-09-20 23:59:32 · answer #3 · answered by Ford Prefect 7 · 1 2

Conservatives blindly follow whatever their dictator tells them to do. They do not think for themselves or decide for themselves EVER! They only follow along with the official talking points.

Democrats do think for themselves. Democrats work hard to make things work for our country. Unfortunately, the Republicans have taken it upon themselves to bar all democrats from Congress whenever debate is happening. Democrats are not allowed to call witnesses, speak in debates, bring bills forward to be voted upon, or have any say whatsoever.

2006-09-20 23:54:32 · answer #4 · answered by corwynwulfhund 3 · 1 4

That's a very good point! All they ever do is complain about other peoples decisions yet they have no ideas, no plans, no anything. All they do is ***** and moan about everything.

2006-09-21 00:01:58 · answer #5 · answered by Cinner 7 · 3 1

Uh - democrats can't decide anything when the republicans control congress and the executive.

2006-09-21 00:01:19 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1 2

They specialize in being "back seat drivers" and "Monday morning quarterbacks". They tend to be a bit lacking in the spine department.

2006-09-21 00:38:59 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 3 1

It is just another sign of the moral weakness that is rampant in their party. I remember when Kerry fell on his butt while skiing, he yelled at his bodyguards, could you imagine Bush doing this.

2006-09-21 00:01:45 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 3 1

washingtonpost.com
Nonprofits Get Federal Anti-Terror Funding
Church-State Issues Divide Jewish Leaders

By Caryle Murphy
Washington Post Staff Writer
Thursday, October 20, 2005; B01



Thirty-one nonprofit organizations in the Washington area, including 14 synagogues and eight hospitals, have received federal grants ranging from $26,000 to $100,000 to fortify their facilities under an anti-terrorism program that has divided Jewish leaders and drawn criticism from the U.S. Department of Homeland Security.

The grants are part of a $25 million nationwide program that Congress approved last year and recently renewed for fiscal 2006 to protect nonprofit groups deemed highly vulnerable to a terrorist attack.

The Jewish community has long been security conscious because of terrorist attacks abroad on synagogues and Jewish centers, and that explains why a large number of Jewish organizations applied for the grants and received them, said Ronald Halber, executive director of the Jewish Community Relations Council of Greater Washington.

United Jewish Communities, which represents more than 550 Jewish organizations in North America, took credit in a news release last week for lobbying Congress to set up and renew the program.

But the executive board of the Union for Reform Judaism advised Reform temples not to apply for the funds. In a memo to member congregations, Reform leaders called the security grants "a serious violation of church-state separation" and said the $25 million "could have been better used beefing up first responders and police protection in high-risk areas."

A spokesman for the Department of Homeland Security said that the program is unnecessary and that the department tried unsuccessfully to have the money taken out of its 2006 budget. State and city officials already had the authority to award their federal homeland security money to nonprofit groups, including religious ones, and creation of the fund forced officials to set up a new disbursement system, said department spokesman Marc Short.

2006-09-20 23:51:01 · answer #9 · answered by too K 2 · 0 5

sam reason any other party cant blame themselves.

2006-09-21 01:20:38 · answer #10 · answered by Mr.happy 4 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers