English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

If a mother aborts her child, it's her choice. It's not murder. Isn't that what the pro-choicers say? If that's true, then why would a criminal get charged w/ double homicide if he/she killed a pregnant woman and her child?

2006-09-20 16:45:53 · 29 answers · asked by JustMyOpinion 5 in Pregnancy & Parenting Pregnancy

I forgot to add- keep personal insults to yourself, "retard" And this is the first time I've posted this question. Get your facts straight before you go making accusations.

2006-09-20 16:51:42 · update #1

Abortion is done because people don't want to take responsibility for their actions.

2006-09-20 16:54:08 · update #2

Just wanted to add- I found out I was pregnant when I was 21- and unmarried. So I know how terrifying it is to be in that situation. But, I owned up to my actions. Just because I made a mistake, I didn't make my child suffer for it. I have a beautiful 20 month old daughter now.

2006-09-20 17:21:39 · update #3

29 answers

i dont belive in abortion i think it is murder the mother is killing something that is living and with a heartbeat! its a life and it is killing! either way u look at it!

2006-09-20 16:50:55 · answer #1 · answered by brittany1121 2 · 2 4

In nature its very common for animals to abort or miscarry their young. Sometimes it is a mistake, but some animal species do this instinctively when they sense there is something wrong or there is not enough food supply. It is NOT a sin for a mother animal to do this and it is not a sin for a woman to make this choice. Even if it were a sin, it is the woman who will answer for it and no one else.

That said, murder is a totally different situation. In that case, the choice is taken away from both mother and child. Since the government insists that a fetus is a child after a certain stage of development, the murderer can be charged with a double murder provided the pregnancy is that advanced. Some states might insist on charging a man with double homicide no matter what stage the pregnancy is in.

Did you know that 95% of the murders of pregnant women have been accomplished by the fathers of the unborn children? Guess they didn't want to pay child support.

2006-09-20 17:03:49 · answer #2 · answered by loryntoo 7 · 2 0

Tough question. You should try to choose your questions wisely. People tend to get upset over politics, religion, and closer related: abortion.
If a woman is murdered and she is with child, it depends how far along she is to call it double homicide. If she is 6 months pregnant, then yes, but if she is 6 weeks, then no. Not my opinion, that is truth. You can still abort a 6 week old fetus but not a 6 month. See the difference. Again, not my opinion, but truth.
I think the way I look at is like this: if you haven't been in that 'situation', then you don't know. People who have not been pregnant, shouldn't be able to give an opinion on pro choice or pro life. Until you have had to feel the pressure both ways, one should can it. I found myself pregnant and unmarried. I found out on a Tuesday and left for the Clinic Tuesday night. My appointment was Wednesday morning. When I got there, I changed my mind.Something in me said to keep it. Now I have a beautiful 5 year old little boy. My husbands ex girlfriend had 2 abortions and it really really messed with her mentally. She cries a lot and thinks of what could have been. Sad really.
Luckily in this country, our bodies are still our bodies. We do ultimately have the choice. That is how it is.

2006-09-20 17:14:19 · answer #3 · answered by ? 4 · 1 0

I think that if a mother chose to get an abortion no matter what size of the fetus is, it is still a human
developing. The same as you said , a criminal is suppose to be charged with double homicide if they kill a pregnant. Did you know doctors takes the baby out of the womb pulling their feet with iron scissors , then they cut the neck off the baby leaving the head inside of the woman and after that , they stick a painful needle through the baby's ear while the child is fighting for its life so that the brain is dead
then it causes the poor little child brain to shrink and leak out of her . Now if you don't consider that murder you just do not have a heart . I believe if a woman gets pregnant and she decides that she does not want it,the simple thing to do is give it up for adoption because as many babies are being killed through this procedure, there are as many people searching for a child to raise no matter if they can not have any or just because they love children and want to expand their family. One day they will see the light because murder is murder. Life is just not fair.

2006-09-20 17:24:17 · answer #4 · answered by povertyliving 2 · 0 1

it extremely is an exceedingly perplexing question to ask, simply by fact it extremely is generally in keeping with opinion. The solutions you do get would be in keeping with very own concept, no longer rapidly data and records. right it extremely is what I could desire to declare; it actual relies upon on the placement! as far as i'm in contact, a fetus isn't seen a residing person until it extremely is first heart beat, something earlier that, each and every thing interior the mummy is purely genetic cloth used to make the fetus. could you communicate approximately masturbating homicide simply by fact the sperm is used to concieave a baby? If no longer, until the fetus develops a heart beat and techniques pastime you are able to not evaluate it alive or maybe someone person. A fetus first starts to enhance it extremely is first heart beat at around 18 to 21 days of gestation. If the abortion is earlier that, i do no longer evaluate it homicide, it extremely is like cleansing a clog out of plumbing, it extremely is all purely uncooked, genetic cloth. If an abortion occurs after that physique of time and the fetus has a lively heart beat or techniques pastime, then it extremely is now a residing, person person and that i could evaluate it homicide. That being stated, your question in all fairness imprecise and unfair to all people answering it. It very just about sounds like a troll question in case you inquire from me. there are multiple circumstances wherein an abortion could be necessary, including a stillborn baby that desires to be removed from the mummy purely on the threat of her very own wellness.

2016-10-17 09:08:40 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

If a person kills a woman and she is in her first trimester, the murderer DOES NOT get charged with a double murder. Same goes for abortion laws. You can only have an abortion up until 3 months. Up until then the baby is considered a ZYGOTE which doctors consider an immature fetus, and therefore, not yet an actual human life. If you want to argue about abortion, argue the ZYGOTE.

2006-09-20 16:54:35 · answer #6 · answered by April Mayhem 3 · 3 1

Not that I know anything, but...it may depend on the age of the fetus. As in the Lacy Peterson case, Connor was a viable human at the time he died, so he was a human. Abortions are done only up to a certain term because it's still a fetus and then after that date/time it's not done legally any more because the child can live (viable) outside the womb.

2006-09-20 16:50:10 · answer #7 · answered by MillwoodsGal 6 · 6 0

I completely see your point and I think it is a double standard. I get that it would be someone else choosing to end the baby's life but if the mother makes the decision its ok?

Also, Abortion is mostly legal BUT if a moms takes a gun and shoots herself in the stomach killing the baby its murder? I dont get it, either way the mother is killing a child but she can be charged for shooting herself but not for an abortion.

2006-09-20 17:11:42 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

Pro-choice, it is not for you to decide what a female does with her body and reason. Murder of a mother and her unborn increases this persons chances of never getting release from prison.

You keep adding more comments:
You indicated not responsible for their own action.
How about rape. How is the female able to cope with this child or knowing she had a child from rape?

There are reason's for everything and again its is not up to you to judge people in the choices they make.

2006-09-20 17:07:01 · answer #9 · answered by Grandpa Shark 7 · 1 0

Abortion isnt done just because people wont take responsibility for their actions. I had an abortion for medical reasons 5 years ago. It still tears me up today so why dont you people PLEASE stop all this anti-abortion crap coz you dont realise how upsetting it is for someone in my situation or any other situation I would imagine!
If you dont agree with it fine, dont do it but you have no right to tell others how to life their lifes!!!

Oh and please people, when a feotus is only 4mm long how are doctore gonna rip it out the womb by its feet... it has no feet!

2006-09-20 18:27:52 · answer #10 · answered by Claire O 5 · 1 0

Let's phrase that in another fashion: the legal framework of the United States does not consider abortion murder - how about that?

Your personal beliefs are all well and good, but until the day that abortion bans spread beyond the wet dreams of paleoconservatives, then that is all that they are - your beliefs.

2006-09-20 16:56:05 · answer #11 · answered by buzzfeedbrenny 5 · 2 0

fedest.com, questions and answers