2006-09-20 16:40:34 · 18 answers · asked by memolino2007@sbcglobal.net 2 in News & Events ➔ Current Events
I would like to see what someone else can do in office.
2006-09-20 16:42:21 · answer #1 · answered by mrkitties420 4 · 2⤊ 2⤋
If he's lucky he'll only face impeachment for repeatedly lying to Congress and the American people (which has been proven many, many times and is absolute grounds for impeachment). He's trying to ram through legislation which will redefine war crimes, cuz he's scared for his own @ss. As things stand right now, he is liable for prosecution as he is the person who executed the orders that people be kidnapped, held in secret prisons without legal representation and tortured.
As for getting rid of the idiot during a "war", I think the 63% of the country that disapproves of his handling of this would be glad to see the back of him (in an orange jumpsuit, of course). Incidentally, we AREN'T at war - read your Constitution - only Congress can declare war, and they haven't done so. The President does not have the constitutional authority to declare war. What's happening in Iraq is, legally, a "police action". Calling this a "war" on terror is linguistic trickery.
A further point is if a person commits a crime - say, a CEO of a major company - do we say "Ah, well, he's in the middle of a complex business deal, so we won't prosecute him"? Like hell we do! Bush needs putting behind bars NOW!
2006-09-21 02:30:17 · answer #2 · answered by That English Dude 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
for what? and do any of you that have said yes really think any impeachment of a sitting President is best for the country? Such an event is horrible for the country for internal moral and for international legitimacy. If you real think this President has done anything that even comes close to an impeachable offense then please just move to Europe.
2006-09-21 00:03:04 · answer #3 · answered by jbreed312000 2 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Impeachment won't happen, though it's best for America. Personally, I'd rather see him tried by the World Court on Crimes against Humanity charges. Any leader that has to ask for an explanation on what constitutes torture is already guilty of it.
2006-09-20 23:50:58 · answer #4 · answered by drshelleyod 1 · 1⤊ 4⤋
Id rather have him serve some real military time in Baghdad.
2006-09-21 01:08:00 · answer #5 · answered by diaryofamadblackman 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
it's not best for bush, but for the rest of us it would be a blessing
2006-09-21 02:35:31 · answer #6 · answered by acid tongue 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
They tried to impeach Clinton for MUCH, MUCH less.
2006-09-20 23:58:30 · answer #7 · answered by sexy.cece 2 · 1⤊ 2⤋
for what? the war...then you have to impeach the whole of congress dem's and rep's alike cause they voted for it.
what kind of uneducated moron are you? obviously one not the least bit interested in the truth but just regurgitating something you heard on cnn.
2006-09-20 23:43:48 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 2⤋
No, however if the house changes so that the Democrats are in charge it could happen.
2006-09-21 02:00:36 · answer #9 · answered by fatboysdaddy 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Of course not . What do you base this conspiracy theory on ? I thought I heard them all by now .
2006-09-21 00:37:57 · answer #10 · answered by missmayzie 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes, I think that would be a good option for him he is running this country in the ground. He is taking away our rights. And he may cost us our freedom has already compromised our safety
2006-09-20 23:56:29 · answer #11 · answered by tracy h 1 · 1⤊ 3⤋